Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Studying injury prevention: practices, problems, and pitfalls in implementation.

Shilpa Sangvai1, Lynne Cipriani, D Kathleen Colborn

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University School of Medicine and Public Health and Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Columbus, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Clinical Pediatrics
|April 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stability and age-specific patterns of rhinovirus circulation in children observed over 3 decades.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2026
Same author

Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

Unraveling <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Carriage: Genomic and Transcriptomic Insights from Acute and Post-Treatment Phases.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Dexamethasone as Adjuvant Therapy for Bacterial Meningitis in Children: What About <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>?

Open forum infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Another Perspective: Should We Swab for Group A Streptococcus?

Pediatrics·2025
Same author

Capture of Group A <i>Streptococcus</i> by open-microfluidic CandyCollect device in pediatric patients.

Bioengineering & translational medicine·2025
Same journal

Exploring Communities: Use of Windshield Surveys in Pediatric Residency Education.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Utility of E-Nose in Paediatric Respiratory Diseases Using Machine Learning Approach: A Pilot Study.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Effect of Preferred Language on Pediatric Rapid Response Activation and Subsequent Intensive Care Utilization.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Documented Caregiver Report of Wheezing at Home is Associated With Decreased Length of Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
Same journal

The Rash That Will Not Go Away.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Virtual Reality Education for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients Improves Intrinsic Motivation: A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Study.

Clinical pediatrics·2026
See all related articles

A chronic care model for child injury prevention showed no significant difference in medically attended injuries compared to standard guidance. Evaluating effectiveness on safety practices through direct observation proved challenging.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health
  • Injury Prevention

Background:

  • Childhood injuries remain a significant public health concern.
  • Standard anticipatory guidance may have limitations in preventing injuries.
  • A chronic care model (CCM) offers a structured approach to managing health conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CCM for childhood injury prevention.
  • To compare the CCM approach with standard anticipatory guidance.
  • To assess the impact on actual safety practices in young children's environments.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized, controlled trial involving caregivers of children aged 0-5 years.
  • Intervention group received focused counseling, educational materials, phone follow-up, and safety resources.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Outcomes measured included medically attended injuries and observed safety practices via home visits.

    • Main Results:

    • Low participation rate (35.1%) limited the study's power.
    • No significant difference in medically attended injuries between the CCM and standard guidance groups (P = 0.6).
    • Direct observation of safety practices in 27 households presented methodological challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • The effectiveness of the CCM for injury prevention in primary care could not be definitively determined.
    • Challenges in evaluating injury prevention strategies through direct observation of safety practices were highlighted.
    • Further research is needed to refine methods for assessing the impact of interventions on child safety behaviors.