Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Increased bone formation to unstable nano rough titanium implants.

Luiz Meirelles1, Anna Arvidsson, Tomas Albrektsson

  • 1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden. luiz.meirelles@odontologi.gu.se

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|April 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.

Odontology·2026
Same author

Local Delivery of Genistein in Peri-Implant Defects Enhances Osseointegration in Ovariectomized Rats.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same author

A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures-Part 2: Patient Factors.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2025
Same author

Effects of scan body material, length and top design on digital implant impression accuracy and usability: an <i>in vitro</i> study.

The journal of advanced prosthodontics·2025
Same author

Sixty Years of Osseointegration: The Past, the Present, the Future.

Journal of periodontal research·2025
Same author

Impact of High Insertion Torque on Implant Surface Integrity.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2025

Contrary to expectations, unstable titanium implants showed greater early bone contact in rabbit tibias. However, primitive bone formation suggests less robust integration than bone-to-implant contact (BIC) alone indicates.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Implant stability is crucial for osseointegration.
  • Surface characteristics influence early bone response.
  • Understanding early bone healing around implants is key for predicting long-term success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare early bone response to stable versus nonstable titanium implants in rabbit tibias.
  • To investigate the effect of implant stability on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone formation.
  • To evaluate the reliability of stable implant models for studying nanoscale surface modifications.

Main Methods:

  • Cylindrical smooth titanium implants (S(a)=0.1 microm) were inserted into rabbit tibias under stable and nonstable conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Surface roughness was analyzed using optical interferometry and atomic force microscopy.
  • Bone response, including bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area, was assessed after 4 weeks.

    • Main Results:

    • Nonstable implants exhibited higher bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and increased bone area in the endosteal region compared to stable implants.
    • Cortical bone area measurements were similar between stable and nonstable implant groups.
    • Primitive woven bone was observed in close contact with both implant types, more so with nonstable implants.

    Conclusions:

    • Higher BIC in nonstable implants does not necessarily equate to stronger osseointegration.
    • The presence of primitive bone suggests less robust anchorage than BIC alone might imply.
    • Stable implant models are reliable for in vivo evaluation of submicron and nanostructures, achieving stability without microirregularities.