Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regulating biorisks: developing a coherent policy logic (part II).

Filippa Lentzos1

  • 1BIOS Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. F.Lentzos@lse.ac.uk

Biosecurity and Bioterrorism : Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science
|April 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distributed Capability, Shared Vulnerability: International Governance of Biosafety and Biosecurity.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Readiness of International Investigations into Alleged Biological Weapons Use.

Emerging infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Tackling health disinformation in conflict settings.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

Generative Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Protein Design Must Consider Repurposing Potential.

GEN biotechnology·2023
Same author

Preventing AI From Creating Biochemical Threats.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2023
Same author

Understanding Biosafety and Biosecurity in Ukraine.

Health security·2023
Same journal

Re: optimization of interventions in ebola.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
Same journal

Enhancing US-Japan cooperation to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
Same journal

Interfacing a biosurveillance portal and an international network of institutional analysts to detect biological threats.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
Same journal

Regional collaboration among Urban Area Security Initiative regions: results of the Johns Hopkins urban area survey.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
Same journal

Travel bans will increase the damage wrought by ebola.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
Same journal

Global agenda, local health: including concepts of health security in preparedness programs at the jurisdictional level.

Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science·2014
See all related articles

This study examines how UK regulators adapted to post-9/11 biorisk policies. Understanding regulatory strategies and interactions is key for effective biological agent and GMO oversight.

Area of Science:

  • Biosecurity and Biosafety
  • Regulatory Science
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The first article detailed UK regulators' practices pre-9/11.
  • Post-9/11, increased concerns regarding biological threats emerged.
  • This necessitates an examination of evolving regulatory frameworks for biological agents and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the adaptation of UK regulators' working practices in response to the post-9/11 security environment.
  • To investigate changes in regulatory strategies and interaction styles concerning biological research.
  • To inform the development of a coherent policy logic for biorisk management.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical analysis of regulator working practices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative examination of regulatory implementation processes.
  • Case study of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Biological Agents Unit.

    • Main Results:

    • Regulatory activities and strategies have evolved significantly post-9/11.
    • Adaptation to new policy and security environments is evident in working practices.
    • The study highlights shifts in how regulators interact with those they oversee.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding regulatory implementation is crucial for effective biorisk management.
    • The findings provide insights into the challenges and successes of adapting biosafety regulations.
    • This research contributes to developing a robust policy framework for biological research oversight.