Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
A comparison of structural measurements using 2 Stratus optical coherence tomography instruments
Mitra Sehi1, Delia C Guaqueta, William J Feuer
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418, USA. msehi@med.miami.edu
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments show significant differences in measuring retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and optic disc topography. Intermachine variability exceeds interoperator variability, impacting glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Glaucoma Research
Background:
- Accurate measurement of ocular structures is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring eye diseases like glaucoma.
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a key technology for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and optic disc topography.
- Variability in measurements between different OCT instruments can affect clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare RNFL thickness, optic disc topography, and central foveal thickness measurements between two different Stratus OCT instruments.
- To assess the impact of different OCT instruments on diagnostic parameters in normal and glaucoma subjects.
Main Methods:
- Ten normal and ten glaucoma subjects were enrolled.
- Consecutive scans were performed using two Stratus OCT instruments by two operators using standardized protocols (fast RNFL, fast macular thickness, fast optic disc).
- Statistical analyses included two-factor fixed effects ANOVA and variance component analysis to determine variability due to subject, operator, and machine.
Main Results:
- Significant differences (P<=0.003) were found between OCT instruments for average, superior, and inferior RNFL thickness and central foveal thickness in normal eyes.
- In glaucomatous eyes, significant differences were observed in average and superior RNFL thickness and cup/disc area ratio.
- Intermachine variability (0.0%–16.4%) was consistently larger than interoperator variability (0.0%–2.4%) across all measurements.
Conclusions:
- Measurements of RNFL thickness, optic disc topography, and central foveal thickness are not interchangeable between different Stratus OCT instruments.
- The choice of OCT instrument can introduce significant variability, potentially impacting the longitudinal assessment of glaucoma progression.
- Clinicians should be aware of inter-instrument differences when interpreting OCT data for patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
