Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters.

Carol A Edwards1, Anne C Ferguson-Smith

  • 1Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.

Current Opinion in Cell Biology
|May 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ZFP57 is a regulator of postnatal growth and life-long health.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Young KRAB-zinc finger gene clusters are highly dynamic incubators of ERV-driven genetic heterogeneity in mice.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

From mammary glands to nutrients: genetic insights into milk composition†.

Biology of reproduction·2025
Same author

Dynamic allelic expression in mouse mammary glands across the adult developmental cycle.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Germline variants in <i>UHRF1</i> are associated with multilocus imprinting disturbance in humans and mice.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Young KRAB-zinc finger gene clusters are highly dynamic incubators of ERV-driven genetic heterogeneity in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Mechanosensing in immune cells: Implications for migration and beyond.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Emerging role of organelles in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear adaptation in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Patterns in motion: Choreographing dynamic cell behaviours during tissue repair.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Quo vadis reconstituted cell surfaces? Purpose and future perspectives for minimal systems of the cell plasma membrane.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear determinants of mRNA and protein isoforms.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026
See all related articles

Genomic imprinting uses DNA methylation at imprinting control regions (ICRs) to regulate gene clusters. Maternal ICRs often act as promoters, while paternal ICRs function differently, suggesting distinct roles in gene regulation.

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Genomics
  • Gene Regulation

Background:

  • Clustered imprinted genes are regulated by differentially methylated imprinting control regions (ICRs).
  • DNA methylation is the primary signal for imprinting, but establishment and maintenance mechanisms vary.
  • ICRs control gene activity and repression in cis over large genomic regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the distinct mechanisms of maternal and paternal imprinting control regions (ICRs).
  • To understand how DNA methylation patterns at ICRs influence gene expression.
  • To compare the functional roles of maternally and paternally methylated ICRs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of DNA methylation patterns at imprinting control regions (ICRs).
  • Comparison of ICRs methylated in the maternal germline versus the paternal germline.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigating the association between antisense transcript elongation and imprinting control.

    • Main Results:

    • Most ICRs are methylated in the maternal germline and function as promoters for antisense transcripts.
    • Antisense transcript elongation from maternal ICRs is linked to imprinting control.
    • Paternally methylated ICRs are located between genes and do not act as promoters; one functions as an insulator.

    Conclusions:

    • Maternal and paternal methylation imprints at ICRs function distinctly.
    • The location and promoter activity of ICRs differ based on their parental origin.
    • Understanding these differences is crucial for comprehending complex gene regulation in imprinted clusters.