Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
The function of punishment in the "civil" commitment of sexually violent predators
Kevin M Carlsmith1, John Monahan, Alison Evans
1Department of Psychology, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA. kcarlsmith@colgate.edu
Abstract:
Two experiments find that support for civil commitment procedures for sexually violent predators is based primarily upon the retributive rather than incapacitative goals of respondents. Two discrete samples composed of students (N = 175) and jury-eligible citizens (N = 200) completed experimental surveys assessing their support or opposition to scenarios in which a sexual predator was to be released after completing his criminal sentence. Respondents were sensitive to likelihood of recidivism only when the initial sentence was sufficiently punitive. When initial sentence was lenient, respondents strongly supported civil commitment without regard to future risk. Results are discussed in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) on the constitutionality of civil commitment laws for sexually violent predators.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Conduct Disorder
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Behavioral Characteristics and...

