Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic scoring systems: which one is best?

Charles Feldman1

  • 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Johannesburg Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. feldmanc@medicine.wits.ac.za

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
|May 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Impact of Environmental and Climate Factors on Pneumonia Pathogenesis.

Clinics in chest medicine·2026
Same author

Recognising RSV infection in adults: The role of recently-developed vaccines.

African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Risk Groups for Vaccine-Preventable Respiratory Infections in Children and Adults: An Overview of the Australian Environment.

Vaccines·2025
Same author

In vitro dexamethasone suppression of cytokine production assay and plasma total and free cortisol responses to ACTH in healthy volunteers.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Pulmonary manifestations of long COVID in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Southern African journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

RSV: an overview of infection in adults.

Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.)·2025
Same journal

Use of gloves: current evidence vs. current use.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
Same journal

Understanding challenges to prevention of healthcare related infections.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
Same journal

Harnessing next-generation microbial diagnostics to optimize infection management in immunocompromised hosts.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
Same journal

Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of antimicrobial-resistant infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
Same journal

Dengue and chikungunya vaccines past, present and future: implications for travelers.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
Same journal

Oropouche virus: viral evolution, epidemiological trends, and challenges for control.

Current opinion in infectious diseases·2026
See all related articles

Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment tools are crucial for determining patient care. While scoring systems show promise, clinical judgment remains essential for accurate hospitalization decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requires initial assessment of illness severity.
  • Severity assessment guides decisions on site of care, diagnostics, and empiric antibiotics.
  • Various severity assessment tools have been developed for CAP patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent findings on community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment tools.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of different scoring systems.
  • To determine optimal use of these tools in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing studies on pneumonia severity scoring systems.
  • Analysis of comparator studies evaluating individual and multiple scoring systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of studies focusing on specific patient subsets (e.g., pneumococcal infections, elderly).

    • Main Results:

    • Studies indicate that many patients in lower severity classes (e.g., Pneumonia Severity Index I and II) are hospitalized, some experiencing complications.
    • Clinical and social factors beyond scoring systems influence hospitalization decisions.
    • Scoring systems demonstrate reasonable sensitivity and specificity in predicting severe pneumonia.

    Conclusions:

    • Pneumonia severity scoring systems have strengths and weaknesses.
    • These tools should complement, not replace, sound clinical judgment.
    • Accurate assessment is vital for appropriate management of community-acquired pneumonia.