Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Usability study of two common defibrillators reveals hazards
Rollin J Fairbanks1, Stanley H Caplan, Paul A Bishop
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Terry.Fairbanks@Rochester.edu
The Lifepak12 monitor-defibrillator is preferred for emergency use over the Lifepak10, despite the Lifepak10 being quicker to learn. User interface improvements are needed for synchronized cardioversion on both devices.
Area of Science:
- Emergency medicine
- Medical device usability
- Paramedic practice
Background:
- Monitor-defibrillators are critical in emergency medical services (EMS).
- Usability of devices like the Lifepak10 and Lifepak12 directly impacts patient care.
- Identifying use-related hazards is crucial for device improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the user interface of the Lifepak10 and Lifepak12 monitor-defibrillators.
- To identify specific use-related hazards associated with each device.
- To inform future design improvements for EMS equipment.
Main Methods:
- Fourteen paramedics performed simulated EMS scenarios using both Lifepak10 and Lifepak12 devices.
- Scenarios included quick look, monitoring, defibrillation, synchronized cardioversion, and paper replacement.
- Data collected included participant self-evaluation and expert observer ratings.
Main Results:
- Participants rated the Lifepak10 easier for quick look (8.0 vs 7.1) and the Lifepak12 for synchronized cardioversion (6.7 vs 5.3).
- Performance was better with the Lifepak12 for synchronized cardioversion and paper replacement.
- 85% of participants preferred the Lifepak12 for regular use; 50% inadvertently delivered unsynchronized shocks for supraventricular tachycardia.
Conclusions:
- The Lifepak12 is perceived as easier to use and more effective in emergencies, though the Lifepak10 is quicker to learn.
- Significant user interface issues exist, particularly with synchronized cardioversion, necessitating reevaluation.
- Simulation limitations were noted, suggesting real-world use may reveal further insights.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
