Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
[Percutaneous inferior vena cava filters: indications and results in 287 patients]
Ivette Arriagada1, Renato Mertens, Francisco Valdés
1Cirugía Vascular y Endovascular, Departamento de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares y División de Cirugía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Insights
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are a safe and effective treatment for preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) when anticoagulation is not an option. This study shows IVC filter implantation has good long-term outcomes for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Anticoagulation is standard for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
- Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is indicated when anticoagulation is contraindicated or ineffective.
- IVC filters serve as a crucial intervention for preventing PE in select patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical experience and outcomes of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implantation.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of IVC filters in preventing PE.
- To report on the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing IVC filter procedures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records and operative protocols for patients who received IVC filters between 1993 and 2005.
- Follow-up conducted via telephone, ambulatory consultation, or death certificates.
- Analysis of implantation success, complications, and long-term outcomes.
Main Results:
- 287 patients underwent IVC filter implantation, with indications including contraindication/complication of anticoagulation, prophylaxis, and massive PE.
- All percutaneous devices were successfully inserted with no procedure-related morbidity or mortality.
- Mean follow-up was 41.5 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 64.7%. Recurrent symptomatic PE occurred in 2.1% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implantation is a safe and effective procedure.
- IVC filters provide a valuable short- and long-term measure for preventing PE.
- The study demonstrates favorable outcomes and low complication rates associated with IVC filter use.
Background:
Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Occasionally this treatment is contraindicated or fails to prevent PE. In these patients, inferior vena caval (IVC) interruption is indicated and insertion of a filter is the most commonly performed procedure.
Aim:
To report the experience with IVC filters.
Material And Methods:
Retrospective review of all medical records and operative protocols of patients subjected to IVC filter implantations. Follow up was performed by telephone contact with the patient, relatives or primary physicians, ambulatory consultation or by death certificates.
Results:
During the period 1993-2005 we implanted IVC filters on 287 patients, 55.4% male, average age: 62.1 yrs (17-99). Indications for the procedure were DVT or PE and contraindication of anticoagulation in 141 patients (49.1%), DVT or PE and complication of anticoagulation in 65 patients (22.6%), prophylaxis in 39 patients (13.6%), massive PE or poor respiratory function in 31 patients (10.8%), paradoxal emboli in 4 patients (1.4%) and other causes in seven patients. All percutaneous devices were successfully inserted. There was no morbidity or mortality related to the procedure. The most frequent access site was the internal jugular vein (66.6%). In 24 patients (8.4%) the filter was intentionally deployed above the renal veins. Six patients (2.1%) were lost to follow up after discharge. A mean follow up of 41.5 months was achieved. Ninety one patients died, with a 5 years survival of 64.7%. Symptomatic recurrent PE occurred in 6 patients (2.1%) and was the cause of death on 3 of them (1%), DVT has been detected in 22 patients (7.7%) during the follow up period.
Conclusions:
IVC filter implantation is a safe and effective short and long term measure to prevent PE and its consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Veins of the Abdomen and Pelvis
The inferior vena cava is fed by numerous smaller veins. The lumbar veins, for instance, drain the posterior abdominal wall, emptying both directly into the inferior vena cava and into the...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction

