Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prehension is really reaching and grasping.

Cornelis van de Kamp1, Frank T J M Zaal

  • 1Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.

Experimental Brain Research
|May 23, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing in-phase to antiphase crew rowing: a first step from the lab to the water.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Perceiving the affordance of interceptability for multiple others.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Does gaze direction influence cycling effort?

PloS one·2025
Same author

Perceiving the affordance of interceptability for another.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Optic flow and cycling effort: Where to look to go faster.

Human movement science·2025
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

The study challenges the "double-pointing hypothesis" of prehension. Findings indicate that opposing digit movements are not independent, contradicting the idea that hand aperture is merely an emergent property.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human movement science
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Prehension is traditionally defined as coordinated reaching and grasping.
  • The "double-pointing hypothesis" proposes prehension as two independently moving digits, with hand aperture as an emergent property.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally test Smeets and Brenner's "double-pointing hypothesis" of prehension.
  • To investigate the independence of digit movements during the prehension task.

Main Methods:

  • Participants reached for and grasped a metallic object with adjustable side surfaces.
  • Perturbations were applied to the end position of one digit after movement initiation.
  • Kinematics of both digits were analyzed following perturbations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Perturbing one digit's end position affected the kinematics of the opposing digit.
  • Observed interdependencies contradict the notion of independently moving digits.
  • Hand aperture was not solely an emergent property of independent digit movements.

Conclusions:

  • The findings conflict with Smeets and Brenner's "double-pointing hypothesis".
  • Digit movements during prehension are not entirely independent.
  • The "double-pointing hypothesis" does not fully explain the kinematics of prehension.