Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Thomas J Beck1

  • 1Division of Medical Imaging Physics, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. tjbeck@jhmi.edu

Current Osteoporosis Reports
|May 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in geometric strength at the contralateral hip between men with hip fracture and non-fractured comparators.

Bone·2019
Same author

Longitudinal changes in hip geometry in relation to the final menstrual period: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Bone·2019
Same author

Femoral stress is prominently associated with fracture risk in children: The Generation R Study.

Bone·2019
Same author

Identification of Novel Loci Associated With Hip Shape: A Meta-Analysis of Genomewide Association Studies.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2018
Same author

Trabecular Bone Score and Hip Structural Analysis in Patients With Atypical Femur Fractures.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry·2018
Same author

Ratchet effect study in Si/SiGe heterostructures in the presence of asymmetrical antidots for different polarizations of microwaves.

Science and technology of advanced materials·2016
Same journal

Beyond Fracture Probability: Communicating the Full Consequences of Fracture and Contextualization.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
Same journal

Time-Lapse HR-pQCT: an in Vivo Imaging-Based Assessment of Bone Remodeling Dynamics.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
Same journal

Cone Beam Computed Tomography of Bonejaws in Patients With Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
Same journal

Testosterone and Bone Health in Men.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
Same journal

Stimulant Medications and Bone Health.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
Same journal

The Innate and Adaptive Immune Functions of Osteoblast-Lineage Cells.

Current osteoporosis reports·2026
See all related articles

Hip structure analysis (HSA) extracts bone strength from DXA scans. While valuable, HSA has limitations, prompting development of next-generation scanners for improved accuracy in bone strength evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Conventional dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures bone mineral density but struggles to infer bone strength.
  • Growing clinical interest in directly evaluating patient bone strength necessitates advanced analytical methods.
  • Existing methods for assessing bone geometry and strength from DXA are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the principles of object strength and engineering simulations.
  • To explain how geometric strength properties can be extracted from DXA data using the Hip Structure Analysis (HSA) method.
  • To discuss limitations of current HSA and potential improvements in future DXA technology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of engineering principles governing object strength.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explanation of geometric property extraction from DXA scans.
  • Discussion of Hip Structure Analysis (HSA) methodology.

    • Main Results:

    • DXA scanners can measure geometric strength, though not their primary design function.
    • The current HSA method is limited to in-plane bending strength, sensitive to femur positioning.
    • Body-size scaling is critical for accurate interpretation of bone geometry.

    Conclusions:

    • The HSA method provides valuable geometric strength insights from DXA but has inherent limitations.
    • Femur positioning and body-size scaling are crucial considerations for HSA precision.
    • Future DXA scanner designs optimized for strength analysis could overcome current limitations.