Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.

Alun G Williams1, Mick Wilkinson

  • 1Institue for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, United Kingdom. a.g.williams@mmu.ac.uk

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|May 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmful anachronism: World Athletics reinstates gene testing to participate in women's competitions.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Integrity is needed in the regulation of transgender athletes and athletes with sex variations.

British journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Variants within the MMP3 and COL5A1 genes associate with soft tissue injury history in elite male rugby athletes.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2025
Same author

Fair and Safe Eligibility Criteria for Women's Sport: The Proposed Testing Regime Is Not Justified, Ethical, or Viable.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2024
Same author

The International Olympic Committee framework on fairness, inclusion and nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations does not protect fairness for female athletes.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2024
Same author

Making competent decisions in sport and exercise science and sports medicine: Preliminary practical guidelines on sex and gender.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2024
Same journal

Seasonal Changes in Collegiate Division-I Soccer Athlete Countermovement Jump Performance.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same journal

Moderate Intensity Resistance Training With Partial Range-of-Motion at Long Muscle Lengths Elicits Similar Hypertrophy and Architectural Adaptations as High Intensity Resistance Training Using Full Range-of-Motion.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same journal

Countermovement Jump Responses During an Academy Rugby League In-Season.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Athletic Movement Quality and Physical Fitness in Athletic Populations: A Systematic Review With Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same journal

Sex Differences in Maximal and Endurance Adductor Strength: Implications for Athlete Screening and Return to Play.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same journal

The Role of Y Balance Test Execution Time in Detecting Chronic Ankle Instability.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
See all related articles

Predicting military box-lifting ability is possible using upright row strength and body measurements. This research shows these simple tests can effectively estimate maximal box-lifting performance for military supply tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Physiology
  • Human Performance
  • Military Science

Background:

  • Box-lifting is crucial for military personnel, particularly for loading supply vehicles.
  • Accurate assessment of lifting capacity is needed for personnel selection and training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive utility of the upright row exercise and anthropometric measures for maximal box-lifting performance.
  • To establish reliable methods for assessing the physical capabilities of military personnel.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies involved adult participants performing maximal box lifts to 1.4m and 1.7m.
  • Subjects underwent testing for upright row one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, body mass, height, and body composition.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • In study 1 (1.4m lift), body mass, composition, and upright row 1RM predicted 95% of the variation in box-lifting performance.
  • Study 2 (1.7m lift) showed the best predictor equation accounted for 80% of the variation.
  • Upright row 1RM strength demonstrated significant predictive value for box-lifting up to chest height.

Conclusions:

  • The upright row 1RM strength is a valuable predictor of box-lifting ability, especially for lifts to approximately chest height.
  • Organizations can utilize anthropometry and 1RM testing as efficient alternatives to direct performance assessments for tasks like 1.4m box lifting.