Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response preparation with static versus moving hands.

Jos J Adam1, Sofie Moresi

  • 1Department of Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. jos.adam@bw.unimaas.nl

Brain and Cognition
|June 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Crossmodal response precueing: age-related differences in action preparation.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

Exploring the effects of mapping rule switching on motor preparation in young and older adults: evidence from combining response cuing and task switching methodology.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Effects of the egg protein hydrolysate NWT-03 on cognitive function in men and women with the metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Nutritional neuroscience·2022
Same author

Proactive motor control within and between hands: Effects of age, motor set, and cue type.

Acta psychologica·2020
Same author

Aerobic Exercise Training Improves Cerebral Blood Flow and Executive Function: A Randomized, Controlled Cross-Over Trial in Sedentary Older Men.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2019
Same author

Both facilitatory and inhibitory impairments underlie age-related differences of proactive cognitive control across the adult lifespan.

Acta psychologica·2017
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The hand-advantage in finger pre-cuing tasks is reduced when hands move, supporting the response inhibition account. This suggests interhemispheric inhibition is less effective when both brain hemispheres are activated.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • The finger pre-cuing task reveals a hand-advantage, where preparing two fingers on one hand is faster than on two hands.
  • This advantage is hypothesized to stem from response inhibition processes operating more efficiently within a single cerebral hemisphere.
  • Increased activation between hemispheres may diminish this within-hemisphere inhibition advantage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the response inhibition account of the hand-advantage in the finger pre-cuing task.
  • To determine if motor activity (moving hands) affects the hand-advantage by altering interhemispheric inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed the finger pre-cuing task under two conditions: static hands and moving hands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study involved twelve healthy participants.
  • Behavioral data on reaction times and accuracy were collected.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant hand-advantage was observed when participants' hands were static.
    • This hand-advantage decreased when participants' hands were moving.
    • The results align with the prediction that increased bilateral activation reduces the within-hemisphere inhibition benefit.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the response inhibition account of the hand-advantage.
    • Motor activity, by increasing interhemispheric communication, can attenuate the benefits of within-hemisphere processing.
    • This has implications for understanding motor control and cognitive processes involving interhemispheric interactions.