Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Mark B Williams, Katherine Andriole

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz, USA.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|June 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Where Your Eyes Go: How AI Output Design Impacts Reading Behavior.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

On the Use and Application of Virtual Reality in Diagnostic Radiology.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Navigating the Blind Spots: The Critical Role of Metacognition in Diagnostic Accuracy.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Impact on PET spatial resolution through positron range confinement in a high magnetic field across tissue-equivalent materials.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Virtual Interview Etiquette for Radiology Residency: A National Survey of Program Directors.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

Leading the Way to Wellness: The Impact of Divisional Leadership Change on Radiologist Well-Being.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Reply.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Radiation Sensibilities: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry Empowers Stakeholders in Radiation Dose Optimization.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in Breast Imaging: Site- and Network-Level Strategies for a Concentrated Consumable Market.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Prostate MRI Practices and PI-RADS Use in China's Mainland: A Nationwide Assessment and Opportunities for Standardization.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

This article provides recommendations for optimizing digital radiography image quality, focusing on processing and display. It aims to establish image quality standards for digital and computed radiography in evolving medical imaging practices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiography Standards

Background:

  • Digital data management is increasingly integral to medical imaging workflows.
  • Data handling impacts patient care quality.
  • Digital radiography is a rapidly evolving field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish image quality standards for digital and computed radiography.
  • To provide recommendations for optimal image processing and display.
  • To complement a previous article on digital radiography image acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Collaborative development by ACR, AAPM, and SIIM.
  • Review of current knowledge on improving digital radiography image quality.
  • Formulation of recommendations for image processing and display.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified key factors for improving digital radiography image quality.
  • Provided recommendations for optimal image processing techniques.
  • Provided recommendations for optimal image display.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal image processing and display are crucial for digital radiography quality.
  • Established standards are necessary due to the rapid evolution of digital radiography.
  • Guidelines and standards require timely revision to keep pace with technological advancements.