Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phase II study of magrolimab combination therapies in patients with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma.

ESMO open·2026

Same author

Does Playing Mahjong Benefit Older Individuals? A Scoping Review.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024

Same author

Postpandemic immunity debt of influenza in the USA and England: an interrupted time series study.

Public health·2024

Same author

Deep Learning-Generated Synthetic MR Imaging STIR Spine Images Are Superior in Image Quality and Diagnostically Equivalent to Conventional STIR: A Multicenter, Multireader Trial.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023

Same author

Emergency care clinical networks.

CJEM·2022

Same author

Five-step hand hygiene programme for students with mild intellectual disability: abridged secondary publication.

Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Development, implementation and reliability assessment of an emergency physician performance evaluation tool.

J Etherington¹, G Innes, J Christenson

¹Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital Site, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

|July 7, 2007

Summary

Physician peer evaluations can be valuable, but a single reviewer is unreliable. Developing a multi-rater tool improves physician performance feedback and departmental evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Healthcare Management
Emergency Medicine

Background:

Physician performance evaluation is crucial for professional development and departmental oversight.
Existing evaluation methods may lack comprehensive feedback mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and implement a peer-based performance evaluation tool for emergency physicians.
To assess the reliability and physician satisfaction with the developed tool.

Main Methods:

A survey with 21 questions across 4 categories was used for peer evaluation by emergency physicians.
Emergency nurses evaluated physicians on a subset of questions.
Factor analysis and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were employed to measure reliability.

Main Results:

Factor analysis identified 3 domains instead of 4, indicating overlap between categories.
Physician peer evaluation showed moderate reliability (ICC=0.43), suggesting multiple reviewers are needed.
Nurse evaluations demonstrated poor reliability (ICC=0.11).
Most physicians (11/15) found the peer review process valuable.

Conclusions:

Single-source physician evaluations are likely unreliable.
A well-designed, multi-faceted physician peer review tool can be effectively developed.
Confidential, broad-based peer reviews are generally perceived as valuable by physicians.