Weak binding between two aromatic rings: feeling the van der Waals attraction by quantum Monte Carlo methods
Sandro Sorella1, Michele Casula, Dario Rocca
1International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34014 Trieste, Italy. sorella@sissa.it
The Journal of Chemical Physics
|July 14, 2007
Summary
This study details the weak chemical bond between benzene molecules. The parallel displaced configuration shows a deeper energy dispersion, with a binding energy of approximately 2 kcal/mol, aligning with experimental data.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Chemical Physics
Background:
- Understanding intermolecular forces is crucial for predicting molecular behavior.
- The weak interaction between aromatic systems like benzene is of significant interest.
- Accurate computational methods are needed to describe these subtle interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the weak chemical bond between two benzene molecules.
- To accurately determine the binding energy and preferred geometry of the benzene dimer.
- To validate computational methods against experimental findings.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pseudopotentials for core electrons and a resonating valence bond (RVB) wave function.
- Employed an improved stochastic reconfiguration technique for wave function optimization.
- Applied lattice regularized diffusion Monte Carlo (LRDMC) for highly accurate energy calculations.
Main Results:
- Achieved a highly accurate description of the benzene dimer using a combination of RVB and LRDMC.
- Found the parallel displaced geometry to have significantly deeper energy dispersion than face-to-face.
- Calculated a weak binding energy of approximately 2 kcal/mol for the parallel displaced configuration.
Conclusions:
- The study provides accurate binding energies for the benzene dimer, consistent with experimental data.
- The parallel displaced geometry is energetically favored over the face-to-face configuration.
- The employed computational approach offers a robust method for studying weak intermolecular interactions.
Related Concept Videos
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Aromatic and Antiaromatic Compounds
In aromatic compounds, such as benzene, the circulation of (4n + 2) π-electrons sets up a diamagnetic or diatropic ring current around the perimeter of the molecule. This current induces a magnetic field that opposes the external field inside the ring and reinforces it on the outside. The protons in benzene are deshielded and exhibit high chemical shifts in the range 6.5–8.5 ppm. The shielding effect at the center of the ring is evident in complex aromatic molecules, such as annulenes. In...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
IR Spectroscopy: Hooke's Law Approximation of Molecular Vibration
A covalently bonded heteronuclear diatomic molecule can be modeled as two vibrating masses connected by a spring. The vibrational frequency of the bond can be expressed using an equation derived from Hooke's law, which describes how the force applied to stretch or compress a spring is proportional to the displacement of the spring. In this case, the atoms behave like masses, and the bond acts like a spring.
According to Hooke's law, the vibrational frequency is directly proportional to the...
According to Hooke's law, the vibrational frequency is directly proportional to the...

