Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging lived experience: a qualitative study on the impact of formerly incarcerated consultants in public policy making to improve safety net services.

Harm reduction journal·2026
Same author

Perspectives on Finances and Mental Health Among Low-Income Latinas.

Journal of financial therapy·2026
Same author

Intersectional HIV disparities among transgender Medicare beneficiaries of color.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same author

Toward decolonized fiscal relationships between universities and community organizations: Lessons learned from the California Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19.

Critical public health·2026
Same author

Community-Academic Workshop on Translating Research Findings into Policy Briefs for Broader Dissemination.

Ethnicity & disease·2026
Same author

Engagement and retention in HIV care in rural Southern U.S. using an All-Payer Claims Database.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Demystifying the NIH grant application process.

Karina M Berg1, Thomas M Gill, Arleen F Brown

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|August 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Navigating the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant application process is challenging. This guide offers practical advice for faculty and fellows seeking research funding for career development or clinical projects.

More Related Videos

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique
08:24

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Published on: June 12, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique
08:24

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Published on: June 12, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Medical Research Funding

Background:

  • Securing funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is crucial for research advancement.
  • The NIH grant application process presents significant challenges for many investigators.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide practical guidance for successfully navigating the NIH grant application process.
  • To demystify common challenges faced by early-stage investigators and fellows.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on practical, experience-based insights into the grant application lifecycle.
  • Targeted advice for generalist faculty and fellows.

Main Results:

  • Offers actionable strategies to overcome common hurdles in NIH submissions.
  • Aims to reduce the learning curve associated with grant writing.

Conclusions:

  • Successful NIH grant applications are achievable with focused, practical guidance.
  • This resource empowers investigators to secure funding for career development and clinical research.