Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

07:59
A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines
Published on: March 4, 2017
Patents and nanomedicine
1Bawa Biotechnology Consulting, LLC, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA. bawabio@aol.com
Nanomedicine (London, England)
|August 25, 2007
Summary
The current patent system hinders nanomedicine innovation due to broad claims and poor examination. Reforms at the US Patent and Trademark Office are essential for commercialization and patient access to nanotechnology advancements.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Nanotechnology
- Intellectual Property Law
Background:
- The traditional pharmaceutical business model is challenged by patent expirations of blockbuster drugs.
- Nanomedicine offers significant potential for improving patient quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.
- Novel R&D strategies, including nanotechnology, are crucial for drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of the current patent landscape on nanomedicine commercialization.
- To identify bottlenecks in nanomedicine R&D and patent protection.
- To advocate for reforms at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patent proliferation and examination practices at the PTO.
- Evaluation of the US National Nanotechnology Initiative's definition and its impact on patent classification.
- Assessment of the current patent thicket in nanomedicine sectors.
Main Results:
- A complex and uncertain patent landscape exists in nanomedicine due to patent proliferation and broad claims.
- Inaccurate definitions and inadequate classification systems exacerbate patenting issues.
- Concerns regarding patent validity and enforceability are widespread among nanomedicine players.
Conclusions:
- The current patent system poses a significant threat to nanomedicine innovation and commercialization.
- Urgent reforms are needed at the PTO to improve patent quality, examination, and search capabilities.
- A robust patent system is critical to stimulate the development and accessibility of nanomedicine products.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Site-Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: Polymeric Carriers
Polymeric carriers enhance targeted drug delivery by increasing efficacy while minimizing off-target effects. These carriers comprise a biodegradable polymeric backbone integrated with functional elements that enable targeting, improve physicochemical properties, and regulate drug release.Targeting MechanismsThe targeting ability of polymeric carriers is mediated by a homing device, which is a molecular recognition component designed to selectively bind to specific tissues or cells. Monoclonal...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
