Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive neurophysiology: beyond averaging.

Juergen Fell1

  • 1Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Str. 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany. juergen.fell@ukb.uni-bonn.de

Neuroimage
|August 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A-phase Occurrence During Sleep in the Deep Brain Recordings: Multiscale-Entropy and Multiscale-DFA Analysis.

Brain topography·2026
Same author

Single-Neuron Responses to Odor-Related Words in the Human Amygdala.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Can transcranial direct current stimulation aimed at reducing mind wandering alleviate depression?

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Mind wandering, poor sleep, and negative affect: a threefold vicious cycle?

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

Side effects of monaural beat stimulation during sustained mental work on mind wandering and performance measures.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Mind wandering in anxiety disorders: A status report.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2023
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Averaging event-related potentials (ERPs) in cognitive electrophysiology conflates amplitude and phase-locking. Separating these factors is crucial for accurate interpretation of EEG and fMRI data.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Averaging event-related potentials (ERPs) is standard in cognitive electrophysiology.
  • This averaging method combines neural response amplitude and inter-trial phase-locking.
  • The functional meaning of phase-locking in ERPs remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the necessity of separating amplitude and phase contributions in ERP analysis.
  • To prevent misinterpretations arising from standard ERP averaging techniques.
  • To clarify the relationship between electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs) from repeated sensory stimuli.
  • Examination of factors contributing to average ERP responses: single-trial amplitude and phase-locking.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of the relationship between EEG amplitude and Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (BOLD) signals in fMRI.

    • Main Results:

    • Standard ERP averaging can lead to misinterpretations.
    • Increased poststimulus single-trial amplitudes may reflect neural activation.
    • Inter-trial phase-locking's functional interpretation is ambiguous.
    • BOLD signals likely correlate with single-trial EEG amplitudes, not phase-locking.

    Conclusions:

    • Separating amplitude and phase contributions in ERPs is essential.
    • This separation is vital for accurate interpretation of cognitive electrophysiology data.
    • Understanding the distinct contributions of amplitude and phase advances the integration of EEG and fMRI findings.