Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electronic technology for clinical prosthodontics.

H C Crow1, W D McCall, N D Mohl

  • 1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Current Opinion in Dentistry
|April 11, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Change in students' critical thinking over the course of dental education.

Journal of dental education·2023
Same author

Immediate Effect of Ultrasound on Bilateral Masseter Myalgia: A Randomized Dose-Response Clinical Trial.

Journal of oral & facial pain and headache·2022
Same author

Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess critical thinking disposition and metacognition in dental students.

Journal of dental education·2020
Same author

A Systematic Review of Critical Thinking Instruments for Use in Dental Education.

Journal of dental education·2019
Same author

Immediate Effect of Continuous Ultrasound vs Sham Ultrasound for Bilateral Masseter Myalgia: A Double-Blinded Trial.

Journal of oral & facial pain and headache·2018
Same author

Reliability and diagnostic validity of a joint vibration analysis device.

BMC oral health·2017
Same journal

Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Bibliography of the current world literature. Pedodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Bibliography of the current world literature. Orthodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Advances in the treatment of acquired and developmental defects of hard dental tissues.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

The child as a dental patient.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

The need for long-term multicenter treatment assessment of craniofacial developmental disorders including cleft lip and palate.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
See all related articles

Current electrodiagnostic devices lack proven utility in clinical dentistry due to flawed study designs. More research is needed to establish the diagnostic value of jaw tracking and electromyography.

Area of Science:

  • Dental diagnostics
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Clinical research methodology

Background:

  • Electrodiagnostic devices are increasingly explored for clinical dentistry applications.
  • Substantiating the diagnostic utility of these devices requires rigorous scientific evidence.
  • Existing literature presents limitations in current research methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and assess the existing literature on electrodiagnostic devices in clinical dentistry.
  • To identify limitations in current research designs and statistical approaches.
  • To determine the need for further research to validate diagnostic claims.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of electrodiagnostic devices in dentistry.
  • Critical analysis of research methodologies, including control group selection and statistical tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of gaps in evidence regarding diagnostic accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Current studies have not substantiated the clinical utility of electrodiagnostic devices.
    • Significant research design flaws were identified, including inadequate control subjects and inappropriate statistical methods.
    • The diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, of these devices remains largely unproven.

    Conclusions:

    • The utility of electrodiagnostic devices in clinical dentistry is not currently supported by robust evidence.
    • Methodological improvements are essential for future research in this field.
    • Further studies measuring sensitivity and specificity are required to establish the diagnostic value of jaw tracking and electromyography.