Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stethoscopes: what are we hearing?

Dale Callahan1, Jonathan Waugh, George Allen Mathew

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA. dcallahan@ieee.org

Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
|September 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relatively Low β-Cell Responsiveness Contributes to the Association of BMI with Circulating Glucose Concentrations Measured under Free-Living Conditions among Pregnant African American Women.

The Journal of nutrition·2016
Same author

Association of late-night carbohydrate intake with glucose tolerance among pregnant African American women.

Maternal & child nutrition·2015
Same author

Medical school curriculum characteristics associated with intentions and frequency of tobacco dependence treatment among 3rd year U.S. medical students.

Preventive medicine·2015
Same author

Current applications of capnography in non-intubated patients.

Expert review of respiratory medicine·2014
Same author

Teaching tobacco dependence treatment and counseling skills during medical school: rationale and design of the Medical Students helping patients Quit tobacco (MSQuit) group randomized controlled trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2014
Same author

Tobacco dependence treatment teaching by medical school clerkship preceptors: survey responses from more than 1,000 US medical students.

Preventive medicine·2013
Same journal

Improving Sterile Processing Operational Efficiency through Organizational Change.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
Same journal

Detecting Secondary Medication Infusion Errors via Spectrophotometry.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
Same journal

Inactivation of Endotoxin by Moist Heat, Electron Beam, and Gamma Irradiation.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
Same journal

Biological Indicators and Process Challenge Devices for Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic Instrument Defect Detection: A Prospective, Multisite Study.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
Same journal

Impact of Leadership Structures on Sterile Processing Performance and Patient Safety.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces an objective method to assess stethoscope audio quality, categorizing them into five types. It reveals performance differences, aiding in selecting the best stethoscope for specific medical needs.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Acoustics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Stethoscope audio quality is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
  • Existing methods for evaluating stethoscope performance lack objectivity.
  • Standardized testing is needed to compare diverse stethoscope models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an objective methodology for testing stethoscope audio quality.
  • To classify stethoscopes into five functional categories based on intended use.
  • To compare the audio performance across these categories.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an objective test methodology for stethoscope audio performance.
  • Classified 39 stethoscopes from 11 manufacturers into five categories: basic assessment, cardiology, disposable, high-end cardiology, and physical assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted over 500 tests to determine audio loss across the frequency spectrum.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified the stethoscope with minimal audio loss within each of the five categories.
    • Compared the audio performance of the top-performing stethoscope from each category.
    • The objective methodology provided comparisons independent of manufacturer claims.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed objective methodology enables reliable side-by-side comparison of stethoscope audio quality.
    • Significant audio performance variations exist among different stethoscope categories.
    • This research aids clinicians in selecting stethoscopes based on objective performance data.