Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing.

M E Le Pelley1, T Beesley, M B Suret

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. lepelleyME@cf.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|September 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electron beam evaporation of superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Cannabis use in early adolescence is associated with higher negative schizotypy in females.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2017
Same author

Erratum to: Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans.

Learning & behavior·2013
Same author

Learned predictiveness influences automatic evaluations in human contingency learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2012
Same author

Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?

Learning & behavior·2012
Same author

Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2012
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Blocking in associative learning may stem from altered cue processing, not just memory interference. This study provides evidence supporting the role of processing changes in human blocking phenomena.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning Sciences
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Associative learning theories suggest blocking arises from changes in cue processing.
  • Previous research (Kruschke & Blair, 2000) yielded ambiguous results, interpretable by interference or processing-change theories.
  • A direct test differentiating these theories in human learning was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether blocking in human associative learning reflects changes in cue processing.
  • To differentiate between processing-change and interference accounts of blocking.
  • To provide empirical support for the role of processing alterations in learning.

Main Methods:

  • Designed an experimental paradigm where processing-change and interference theories predict opposing outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized human participants in a controlled associative learning task.
  • Analyzed behavioral data to infer underlying learning mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • The observed results were consistent with predictions derived from a processing-change account.
    • Findings contradicted explanations based solely on interference in learning or memory.
    • Evidence supports that altered cue processing is a key factor in human blocking.

    Conclusions:

    • Blocking in human associative learning can be explained by changes in the processing of cues.
    • This study offers a refined understanding of the mechanisms underlying associative learning.
    • The findings contribute to the theoretical framework of cognitive learning processes.