Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Personnel selection.

Paul R Sackett1, Filip Lievens

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. psackett@umn.edu

Annual Review of Psychology
|September 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

John P. Campbell (1937-2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Graduate grade inflation at a U.S. research-intensive university: A 22-year longitudinal analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Planned missingness to reduce survey length: A sheep in wolf's clothing.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

What do assessment center ratings reflect? Consistency and heterogeneity in variance composition across multiple samples.

The Journal of applied psychology·2025
Same author

Examining Gender-Based Differences in Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments in Faculty Assessments by Residents and Fellows.

Journal of graduate medical education·2025
Same author

Personality and personnel selection: Going beyond self-reports and linear relationships.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same journal

Implicit Bias: Evolution of a Powerful Idea.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Social Robotics Is Not (Just) About Machines, It Is About People: Psychology's Role in Developing Social Machines.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Intensive Longitudinal Methods: Toward a Psychological Science of Daily Life.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Space to Act, Think, and Create.

Annual review of psychology·2025
See all related articles

This review examines advancements in personnel selection since 2000, focusing on enhancing criterion understanding, predictor measurement, and fairness. It provides a framework for improving employee selection systems and decision-making processes.

Area of Science:

  • Industrial-Organizational Psychology
  • Human Resource Management
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Personnel selection practices have evolved significantly since the last comprehensive review in 2000.
  • Continuous improvement in employee selection is crucial for organizational success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and synthesize developments in personnel selection over the past two decades.
  • To provide a taxonomic structure for understanding and advancing selection methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of research published since 2000.
  • Organization of findings around a taxonomic framework of selection improvement bases.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified key areas for advancement including criterion measurement, predictor development, and understanding predictor-criterion relationships.
  • Highlighted the importance of addressing subgroup differences, fairness, legal defensibility, and administrative ease.
  • Emphasized the need for improved insight into applicant reactions and decision-maker acceptance.

    • Conclusions:

    • Significant progress has been made in personnel selection, with ongoing opportunities for refinement.
    • A structured approach is essential for integrating new knowledge and improving the effectiveness and fairness of selection systems.