Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ferromagnetism01:31

Ferromagnetism

Materials like iron, nickel, and cobalt consist of magnetic domains, within which the magnetic dipoles are arranged parallel to each other. The magnetic dipoles are rigidly aligned in the same direction within a domain by quantum mechanical coupling among the atoms. This coupling is so strong that even thermal agitation at room temperature cannot break it. The result is that each domain has a net dipole moment. However, some materials have weaker coupling, and are ferromagnetic at lower...
Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
Semiconductors01:22

Semiconductors

There is variation in the electrical conductivity of materials - metals, semiconductors, and insulators that are showcased with the help of the energy band diagrams.
Metals such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), or lead (Pb) have low resistivity and feature conduction bands that are either not fully occupied or overlap with the valence band, making a bandgap non-existent. This allows electrons in the highest energy levels of the valence band to easily transition to the conduction band upon gaining...
Fermi Level01:18

Fermi Level

The Fermi-Dirac function is represented by an S-shaped curve indicating the probability of an energy state being occupied by an electron at a given temperature. The Fermi level is the energy level at which there is a fifty percent chance of finding an electron, and it is positioned between the lower-energy valence band and the higher-energy conduction band.
At absolute zero temperature, electrons fill all energy states up to the Fermi level, leaving upper states empty. As the temperature rises,...
Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges01:25

Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges

A stationary charge creates and interacts with the electric field, while a moving charge creates a magnetic field.
Consider a point charge moving with a constant velocity. Like the electric field, the magnetic field at any point is directly proportional to the magnitude of the charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the source point and the field point. However, unlike the electric field, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to the plane containing the line...
Metal-Semiconductor Junctions01:24

Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

The contact of metal and semiconductor can lead to the formation of a junction with either Schottky or Ohmic behavior.
Schottky Barriers
Schottky barriers arise when a metal with a work function (Φm) contacts a semiconductor with a different work function (Φs). Initially, electrons transfer until the Fermi levels of the metal and semiconductor align at equilibrium. For instance, if Φm > Φs, the semiconductor Fermi level is higher than the metal's before contact. The semiconductor's...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fermi level position, Coulomb gap, and Dresselhaus splitting in (Ga,Mn)As.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction.

Nature materials·2010
Same author

Anomalous Hall effect in field-effect structures of (Ga,Mn)As.

Physical review letters·2010
Same author

Spatially homogeneous ferromagnetism of (Ga, Mn)As.

Nature materials·2010
Same author

3DAP analysis of (Ga,Mn)As diluted magnetic semiconductor thin film.

Ultramicroscopy·2009
Same author

Magnetization vector manipulation by electric fields.

Nature·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

Universality classes for domain wall motion in the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As.

M Yamanouchi1, J Ieda, F Matsukura

  • 1Semiconductor Spintronics Project, Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 1-18 Kitamemachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-0023, Japan.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|September 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals distinct mechanisms driving magnetic domain wall motion in ferromagnetic semiconductors. Magnetic fields and spin currents exhibit different scaling laws, indicating fundamentally different underlying physics.

More Related Videos

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
07:42

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains

Published on: July 20, 2022

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
07:42

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains

Published on: July 20, 2022

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Spintronics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Magnetic domain wall motion is crucial for spintronic devices.
  • Understanding the driving mechanisms by magnetic fields and spin currents is essential but incomplete.
  • Ferromagnetic semiconductors like (Ga,Mn)As offer a unique platform to study these phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare magnetic domain wall motion mechanisms induced by magnetic fields and spin-polarized currents.
  • To investigate the thermally activated creep regime in (Ga,Mn)As.
  • To elucidate the fundamental differences in drive mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental measurements of domain wall velocity in (Ga,Mn)As.
  • Analysis of motion in the creep regime governed by an Arrhenius scaling law.
  • Comparison of scaling law exponents for field-driven and current-driven motion.

Main Results:

  • Domain wall velocity in (Ga,Mn)As follows an Arrhenius scaling law in the creep regime.
  • Exponents for current-driven and field-driven motion are significantly different.
  • These differences indicate distinct universality classes for the two drive mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • The fundamental mechanisms driving magnetic domain wall motion by magnetic fields and spin currents are fundamentally different.
  • The observed differences in scaling laws provide critical insights into the physics of domain wall dynamics in ferromagnetic semiconductors.