Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, or CMRI, is a non-invasive diagnostic test that employs a magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create precise images of the heart and arteries. It provides comprehensive information about cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization without ionizing radiation.IndicationsCMRI diagnoses various heart conditions, including tissue damage from heart attacks, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis, aortic issues (tears, aneurysms,...

Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy

Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique that provides crucial insights into the body's physiological functions at a molecular level. It is an indispensable resource for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring various illnesses, notably cancer, neurological disorders, and cardiovascular conditions.
Fundamental Principles of PET

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Maximal radial distance for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a histopathological-radiological study.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026

Same author

Easy-to-use background score for routine prostate MRI.

Insights into imaging·2026

Same author

Quantification of myocardial iron and fat-an experimental study with photon-counting detector CT.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same author

Liver Fat and Iron Quantification With Spectral Localizer Radiographs From Photon-counting Detector CT.

Investigative radiology·2025

Same author

Severe anaphylactic reaction to contrast agent: teams are well prepared but should simulate the situations regularly.

The British journal of radiology·2025

Same author

Gadolinium concentration dependent signal enhancement profiles using routine clinical sequences with gadopiclenol, gadoterate, gadobutrol, and gadoxetate at 1.5, 3 and 7 Tesla.

European journal of radiology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.

Michael A Patak¹, Constantin von Weymarn, Johannes M Froehlich

¹Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. michael.patak@insel.ch

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

|September 26, 2007

Summary

This guide details patient preparation and imaging protocols for small bowel MRI at 1.5-T and 3-T scanners. It highlights the benefits and drawbacks of higher field strength MRI for improved diagnostic accuracy.

More Related Videos

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors

Published on: March 29, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors

Published on: March 29, 2019

Area of Science:

Radiology
Medical Imaging
Gastroenterology

Background:

Small bowel Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is crucial for diagnosing various gastrointestinal conditions.
Standardized protocols are essential for consistent and reliable imaging outcomes.
Advancements in MR technology necessitate updated imaging strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide practical guidance on patient preparation for small bowel MR imaging.
To offer specific pulse sequence protocols for both 1.5-T and 3-T MR scanners.
To critically evaluate the advantages and limitations of 3-T MR imaging in small bowel assessment.

Main Methods:

Review of current literature and clinical best practices for small bowel MR imaging.
Development of detailed patient preparation guidelines, including dietary restrictions and oral contrast administration.
Formulation of optimized pulse sequence protocols tailored for 1.5-T and 3-T MR systems.
Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic utility between 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.

Main Results:

Effective patient preparation significantly enhances image quality by reducing artifacts and improving distension.
Dedicated protocols for 1.5-T and 3-T scanners provide high-resolution imaging of the small bowel.
3-T MR imaging offers potential advantages in signal-to-noise ratio but may present challenges with susceptibility artifacts and patient comfort.
Specific sequences are recommended to maximize diagnostic yield at each field strength.

Conclusions:

Optimized patient preparation and field-strength-specific protocols are key to successful small bowel MR imaging.
While 3-T MR imaging shows promise, careful protocol selection and artifact mitigation are necessary.
These guidelines aim to standardize small bowel MR imaging, improving diagnostic accuracy and patient care.