Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

08:40
Absolute Quantification of Aβ1-42 in CSF Using a Mass Spectrometric Reference Measurement Procedure
Published on: March 21, 2017
Standardization of gamma-glutamyltransferase assays by intermethod calibration. Effect on determining common
Josiane Steinmetz1, Françoise Schiele, René Gueguen
1Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique, Centre de Médecine Préventive, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. josiane.steinmetz@cmp.u-nancy.fr
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|October 11, 2007
Summary
Common calibration significantly improved gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) assay consistency across labs. This harmonization enabled the establishment of common reference limits for GGT activity, aiding clinical diagnosis and monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biochemical Assays
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Assessing consistency of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) activity results across different assays.
- Evaluating harmonization of GGT assays through common calibration material.
- Determining if harmonization can establish common reference limits for routine GGT methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the improvement in GGT activity result consistency after calibration.
- To evaluate if harmonization leads to common reference limits for routine GGT methods.
- To assess the impact of a common calibrator on GGT assay comparability.
Main Methods:
- Seven laboratories measured GGT activity using routine systems, with and without a common multi-enzyme calibrator (IFCC value).
- All samples were re-measured using the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference procedure.
- Healthy subjects and subjects with elevated GGT were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Common calibration significantly reduced differences in GGT means between routine methods and the IFCC procedure.
- After calibration, only one laboratory showed a significant difference from the IFCC procedure.
- Common reference limits (11-49 U/L) were calculated for calibrated methods, showing good agreement with IFCC values.
Conclusions:
- Common calibration enhances consistency among routine GGT assays.
- This approach allows for the definition of common reference limits similar to IFCC recommendations.
- Harmonization offers benefits for GGT-related prevention, screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and epidemiological studies.
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Data Validation
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:

