Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
08:08
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019
The duplicate method of uncertainty estimation: are eight targets enough?
Jennifer A Lyn1, Michael H Ramsey, D Stephen Coad
1Food Standards Agency, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, UK WC2B 6NH.
The Analyst
|October 24, 2007
Summary
This study introduces a method for calculating uncertainty estimates using the chi-squared distribution. Eight duplicate samples are recommended for accurate and cost-effective uncertainty analysis.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Statistical Methods
Background:
- Estimating sampling (s(samp)) and analytical (s(anal)) uncertainty is crucial in chemical analysis.
- The duplicate method is a common approach for uncertainty estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present methods for calculating confidence intervals for uncertainty estimates using the chi-squared distribution.
- To justify the recommended minimum of eight duplicate samples for robust uncertainty assessment.
Main Methods:
- Application of the chi-squared distribution for confidence interval calculation.
- Utilizing the duplicate method with a minimum of eight samples.
- Case studies involving moisture in butter and nitrate in lettuce analysis.
Main Results:
- Confidence intervals for sampling and analytical uncertainty were calculated.
- The minimum of eight duplicate samples proved sufficient for accurate uncertainty estimation in the case studies.
- Increased numbers of duplicates beyond eight did not significantly narrow the confidence intervals.
Conclusions:
- The proposed methods provide reliable confidence intervals for uncertainty estimates.
- Eight duplicate samples offer a balance between accuracy and cost-effectiveness for uncertainty analysis.
- The findings support the use of eight duplicates as a standard for similar analytical studies.
Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...