Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

07:57
An Experimental Human DIEP Flap Model to Investigate Preservation Strategies for Vascularized Composite Allografts and Free Flaps
Published on: December 5, 2025
The perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flap method: report of two cases
Hiko Hyakusoku1, Rei Ogawa, Koichiro Oki
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Regenerative Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Japan.
Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi
|October 30, 2007
Summary
Perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flaps offer a microsurgery-free solution for wound reconstruction. These versatile flaps are effective for treating pressure ulcers and open fractures, simplifying complex tissue repairs.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Microsurgery Alternatives
Background:
- Perforator flaps are thin free-tissue transfers that minimize donor site morbidity.
- Propeller flaps utilize surrounding healthy skin for reconstruction.
- The study introduces perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flaps, combining these techniques.
Observation:
- Two cases demonstrate the application of PPP flaps: a sacral pressure ulcer reconstruction using a superior gluteal artery PPP flap and an elbow fracture defect covered by a deep brachial artery PPP flap.
- The flaps were successfully rotated to cover the respective defects.
Findings:
- PPP flaps are effective for reconstructing postburn scar contractures and various other wounds, including pressure ulcers and open fractures.
- This technique eliminates the need for microsurgery.
- PPP flaps can be classified into central axis (90-degree rotation) and acentric axis (180-degree rotation) types, both being easy to harvest.
Implications:
- PPP flaps provide a valuable, less invasive alternative for reconstructive surgery.
- The classification of PPP flaps aids in tailoring their use for specific rotational requirements.
- This method simplifies wound repair, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical complexity.
