Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Logical types and ostensive insight.

J L Ahumada

    The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis
    |January 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study differentiates analogic and digital communication in psychoanalytic interpretation. It highlights how withholding validation of archaic psychic reality, not just verbalization, enables genuine insight.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The rebirth of the idols. The Freudian unconscious and the Nietzschean unconscious.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2001
    Same author

    Disclosures and refutations: clinical psychoanalysis as a logic of enquiry.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·1998
    Same author

    Toward an epistemology of clinical psychoanalysis.

    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1997
    Same author

    What is a clinical fact? Clinical psychoanalysis as inductive method.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·1994
    Same author

    Interpretation and creationism.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·1994
    Same author

    On limited-time group psychotherapy.

    The British journal of medical psychology·1976
    Same journal

    Letter from Oslo.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Marion Milner's foundational influence on Bion's conception of reverie and Winnicott's conception of play.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    Same journal

    How to train psychoanalysts in our time? Exploring controversies around teleanalysis.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Gaza: another psychoanalytic perspective. Reflection on the work of Shmuel Erlich.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Introduction: Questions about internal, external and shared frames, types of loss, methods for scientific dialogue, and the sources of power and authority.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Freud, Sebald and the head of Medusa: The unconscious sense of guilt.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoanalysis
    • Communication Theory
    • Psychology

    Background:

    • Psychoanalytic interpretation distinguishes between transference and extra-transference.
    • Strachey's concept of 'implicit' mutative interpretation bridges explicit and process-oriented transference.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify the distinction between analogic and digital communication modes in psychoanalytic interpretation.
    • To explore the role of 'withholding' validation in achieving 'judgement of reality' and ostensive insight.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of communication modes (analogic vs. digital) in interpretive verbalization.
    • Examination of Strachey's concept of 'implicit' mutative interpretation.
    • Exploration of the analyst's role as a propositional subject and third-party observer.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Discriminating analogic and digital communication enhances understanding of transference.
    • Interpretive verbalization impacts the analogic unconscious, with the analyst as the subject.
    • Withholding validation of archaic psychic reality is crucial for insight, not just the interpretation itself.

    Conclusions:

    • Clearer distinctions in communication modes refine psychoanalytic interpretation.
    • The analyst's gradual explicitation of archaic objects and withholding of validation are key to insight.
    • Insight arises from the 'judgement of reality' informed by the referent of interpretive mapping.