Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Newborn Auditory Brainstem Response and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

Journal of neuroscience research·2025
Same author

Newborn auditory brainstem response and sudden infant death syndrome.

Journal of neuroscience research·2024
Same author

Quick Estimation of Minimum Hearing Levels Using a Binaural Multifrequency Stimulus Paradigm: Proof of Concept.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same author

Sensing echoes: temporal misalignment in auditory brainstem responses as the earliest marker of neurodevelopmental derailment.

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

The Effects of Middle-ear Stiffness on the Auditory Brainstem Neural Encoding of Phase.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2022
Same author

Newborn Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Developmental Disabilities.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Call for calibration standard for newborn screening using auditory brainstem responses.

John D Durrant1, Diane L Sabo, Rafael E Delgado

  • 1Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15260, USA. durrant@pitt.edu

International Journal of Audiology
|November 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Accurate calibration of auditory brainstem response screening devices is crucial for detecting all congenital hearing loss. Current calibration methods need further validation to ensure reliable newborn hearing screening outcomes.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening for newborns has evolved in stimulation modes, from supraaural earphones to insert and circumaural earphones.
  • The development of specialized earphones for newborn screening necessitates standardized calibration procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the need for a standardized calibration method for auditory brainstem response screening devices used in newborns.
  • To evaluate the reliability of current calibration methods and their impact on detecting mild hearing loss.

Main Methods:

  • Bench testing of sound output from transducers of two commercial automated newborn screening instruments.
  • Utilized various measurement approaches, though none specifically modeled the newborn ear.

Main Results:

  • Manufacturers' calibration methods show potential for simplicity and reliability.
  • Concerns identified regarding sound output levels when measured by both manufacturers' and authors' methods.
  • Existing calibration approaches lack a specific model of the newborn ear.

Conclusions:

  • Further research is essential to critically evaluate ABR calibration methods for newborn screening.
  • Establishing appropriate norms and validation studies in newborns is needed to understand the actual sound pressure levels of screening stimuli.
  • Improved calibration standards are vital to prevent missing milder degrees of congenital hearing loss.