Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Major congenital anomalies place extremely low birth weight infants at higher risk for poor growth and developmental
Rachel V Walden1, Sarah C Taylor, Nellie I Hansen
1Pediatrix Medical Group of Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Insights
Extremely low birth weight infants with major congenital anomalies face significantly higher risks for neurodevelopmental impairment and poor growth. These infants also experience over three times the risk of rehospitalization compared to peers without anomalies.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Research
- Pediatric Development
- Congenital Anomaly Studies
Background:
- Limited outcome data exists for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with major congenital anomalies.
- Existing studies often exclude these vulnerable infants, hindering understanding of their growth and neurodevelopmental trajectories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in ELBW infants with and without major anomalies.
- To hypothesize that infants with severe anomalies would exhibit worse growth, neurodevelopmental, and survival outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort analysis of 5920 ELBW infants surviving beyond 12 hours of life (1998-2001) across 19 neonatal network centers.
- Neurodevelopmental and anthropometric evaluations were conducted at 18-22 months corrected age for 3705 children.
- Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon tests, chi2/Fisher's exact tests, and regression models to adjust for confounders.
Main Results:
- Infants with major congenital anomalies showed higher rates of neurodevelopmental impairment (Bayley MDI/PDI < 70), moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy, and smaller length and head circumference (< 10th percentile).
- These infants experienced more rehospitalizations and increased use of early intervention services.
- Major anomalies were associated with increased mortality before 18-22 months corrected age.
Conclusions:
- ELBW infants with major anomalies have nearly double the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment and significantly increased risks of poor growth and rehospitalization.
- Findings underscore the need for targeted support and intervention services for this high-risk population.
- This data is crucial for parental counseling regarding infant outcomes.
Background:
Studies of growth and neurodevelopmental impairment in extremely low birth weight infants often exclude infants with major congenital anomalies; thus, there are few outcome data available on these infants.
Objectives:
The purpose of this work was to compare growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants with major anomalies to extremely low birth weight infants without these findings. It was hypothesized that infants with severe anomalies would have worse growth, neurodevelopmental, and survival outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 5920 extremely low birth weight infants surviving beyond 12 hours of life at 19 neonatal network centers between 1998 and 2001. Infants with significant anomalies were more likely to die before 18 to 22 months' corrected age. A total of 3705 children underwent neurodevelopmental and anthropometric evaluation at 18 to 22 months' corrected age. Statistical significance for unadjusted comparisons was determined by Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and chi2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Regression models were used to compare the outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders.
Results:
Children with major congenital anomalies were more likely to have Bayley Mental Development Index scores of < or = 70, Psychomotor Development Index scores of < or = 70, neurodevelopmental impairment, moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy, length in the < or = 10th percentile, head circumference in the < or = 10th percentile, more rehospitalizations, and higher rates of early intervention use at 18 to 22 months' corrected age.
Conclusions:
At 18 to 22 months' corrected age, extremely low birth weight infants born with major anomalies have nearly twice the risk for neurodevelopmental impairment, increased risk of poor growth, and > 3 times greater risk of rehospitalization when compared with extremely low birth weight infants without major anomalies. This information may be valuable for counseling parents regarding the outcomes of these infants and for the facilitation of appropriate support and intervention services.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Inborn Errors of Metabolism
Nature and Nurture
Neurulation
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

