Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Simple In-House Ultra-High Performance Capillary Column Manufacturing with the FlashPack Approach
Published on: December 4, 2021
Preparative chromatography with supercritical fluids. Comparison of simulated moving bed and batch processes
Stephanie Peper1, Monika Johannsen, Gerd Brunner
1Institute of Thermodynamics, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, D-22043 Hamburg, Germany. peper@hsu-hh.de
Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) offers a greener alternative to organic solvents. Batch-SFC is more profitable than simulated moving bed (SMB)-SFC for production rates between 0.4 and 5 tons per year, despite lower specific productivity.
Area of Science:
- Chemical Engineering
- Green Chemistry
- Separation Science
Background:
- Preparative chromatography is crucial for fine chemical separation.
- Supercritical fluids offer an environmentally friendly alternative to organic solvents in chromatography.
- Green chemistry principles emphasize sustainable and eco-friendly chemical production.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the economic viability and productivity of Batch-supercritical fluid chromatography (Batch-SFC) and simulated moving bed (SMB)-SFC processes.
- To optimize separation systems for specific productivity in SFC.
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Batch-SFC versus SMB-SFC for industrial-scale fine chemical separation.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of Batch-SFC and SMB-SFC processes.
- Optimization of separation systems based on specific productivity.
- Economic analysis considering minimum product price and production rates.
- Investigation using four model systems for fine chemical separation.
Main Results:
- For three out of four model systems, SMB-SFC demonstrated significantly higher specific productivity than Batch-SFC.
- Despite higher specific productivity, SMB-SFC was not always the more economical process.
- Batch-SFC was found to be the more profitable process within the investigated production rate range (0.4–5 t/a).
Conclusions:
- The choice between Batch-SFC and SMB-SFC depends on economic factors beyond specific productivity.
- Batch-SFC can be more profitable than SMB-SFC for certain production scales, even with lower specific productivity.
- Supercritical fluid chromatography presents a viable and potentially economical approach for sustainable fine chemical production.
Related Concept Videos
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...
Principles Of Column Chromatography
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.

