Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Error and deviance processing in implicit and explicit sequence learning.

Nicola K Ferdinand¹, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray

¹Department of Psychology, Experimental Neuropsychology Unit, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. n.ferdinand@mx.uni-saarland.de

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|December 7, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fixation-related potentials reveal that confusing program code elicits a late frontal positivity.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Do you remember? Effects of lexical predictability on false and true recognition memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026

Same author

The search for meaning: Age-related differences in the semantic N400 effect for picture pairs are unrelated to semantic benefits in episodic memory.

Psychology and aging·2026

Same author

Unexpected words that become your best memories: How sentential constraint and word expectedness affect memory retrieval.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025

Same author

Discrepancy attribution depends on retrieval context: Evidence from the word-frequency mirror effect.

Memory & cognition·2025

Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Sequence learning occurs regardless of whether participants are explicitly or implicitly aware of the sequence. Error detection mechanisms, like the error-related negativity (ERN/Ne) and N2b component, are active in both implicit and explicit learning conditions.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Experimental Psychology

Background:

Error-driven learning mechanisms are crucial for adapting behavior.
Understanding implicit learning is key to deciphering unconscious cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if error-driven learning operates under implicit sequence learning conditions.
To compare error monitoring and neural responses between explicit and implicit learning.

Main Methods:

Sequence learning task with regular, irregular, and random sequences.
Explicit (informed) and implicit (uninformed) learning conditions.
Measurement of reaction times and response-locked event-related potentials (ERPs).

Main Results:

Sequence learning occurred irrespective of the learning condition (explicit vs. implicit).

Related Experiment Videos

Error-related negativity (ERN/Ne) signaled error detection in both conditions.

N2b component reflected perceived errors for deviant stimuli, developing faster in explicit learners.

P3b, associated with conscious processing, was observed only in explicit learners.

Conclusions:

Error-driven learning and detection mechanisms function similarly in both implicit and explicit sequence learning.
The N2b component reflects the perception of errors, even in implicit learning.
Conscious processing, indexed by P3b, is specific to explicit learning.