Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pay for performance in thoracic surgery.

Gonzalo Varela1

  • 1Service of Thoracic Surgery, Salamanca UniversitY Hospital, Salamanca, Paseo San Vicente 58 182 Salamanca, Spain. gvs@usal.es

Thoracic Surgery Clinics
|December 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European analysis of patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma and invasive pathologic features who underwent lobectomy versus segmentectomy.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Unplanned Reoperation After Anatomical Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer: Rate, Risk Factors, Early Outcomes and Long-term Prognostic Influence Within a Prospective Multicentre Database.

Archivos de bronconeumologia·2025
Same author

Early outcomes of robotic versus video-thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy: a propensity score-matched real-world study.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2024
Same author

Operative outcomes and middle-term survival of robotic-assisted lung resection for clinical stage IA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Cirugia espanola·2023
Same author

Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Lung Resection Improves Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Patients With Body Mass Index≥25kg/m<sup>2</sup>: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Archivos de bronconeumologia·2023
Same author

Sawubona reprise: reflections on the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Presidential Address 2022.

Journal of thoracic disease·2023
Same journal

Pleuropulmonary Infectious Diseases: Impact of the Diseases and the Scarce Literature.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

TB or Not TB-Septic or Resect? That Is the Question.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgery for Pulmonary Aspergillosis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Current Treatment for Mediastinitis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Mucormycosis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Hydatid Disease.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
See all related articles

Pay-for-performance (PFP) programs aim to improve medical quality but have shown limited success and unintended consequences. Future surgical quality initiatives require robust data and evidence-based guidelines for effective implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement in Medicine
  • Surgical Quality Measurement

Background:

  • Pay-for-performance (PFP) programs are designed to enhance medical practice quality.
  • Early PFP implementations in family practice yielded minimal quality gains and adverse effects, such as patient exclusion.
  • Value-based purchasing is anticipated to expand into surgical specialties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential application and challenges of quality initiatives in surgical practice.
  • To discuss the development of effective quality metrics for surgical specialties.
  • To advocate for the creation of practice guidelines for future surgical quality evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on pay-for-performance programs and quality improvement strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of outcome-based versus process-based quality measures in surgery.
  • Discussion on the data requirements for risk-adjusted outcome models using multi-institutional databases.

    • Main Results:

    • Surgical mortality is a rare primary outcome in contemporary thoracic surgery.
    • Intermediate outcomes like postoperative morbidities and readmissions are more suitable for quality assessment.
    • Process-based quality measures require strong scientific evidence linking them to patient outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing effective quality metrics for surgery necessitates a shift towards intermediate outcomes and evidence-based processes.
    • Accurate data from clinical databases is crucial for risk-adjusted outcome calculations.
    • Establishing practice guidelines and international consensus is essential for future surgical quality initiatives.