Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Order effects in collaborative memory contamination? Comment on Gabbert, Memon, and Wright (2006).

D Stephen Lindsay¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. slindsay@uvic.ca

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|December 20, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Eyewitness suspect identification: six claims regarding the state of the science.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025

Same author

Fostering transparency and reproducibility in psychological science.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2025

Same author

Mixed News about the Bad News Game.

Journal of cognition·2023

Same author

Variability across subjects in free recall versus cued recall.

Memory & cognition·2023

Same author

A direct replication and extension of Popp and Serra (2016, experiment 1): better free recall and worse cued recall of animal names than object names, accounting for semantic similarity.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Same author

Correction: The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2023

Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

See all related articles

Collaborative memory contamination can be influenced by the order in which details are shared. However, previous research findings on this order effect are ambiguous and require further investigation.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Social Psychology
Memory Studies

Background:

Previous studies suggested an order effect in collaborative memory, where the first person to mention a detail influences recall.
This effect implies that the sequence of information sharing impacts memory contamination in group settings.

Discussion:

The original study's analysis conflated instances where both collaborators recalled a detail with cases where only one did.
This methodological ambiguity challenges the definitive conclusion of an order effect in collaborative memory contamination.

Key Insights:

The influence of detail order in collaborative recall is not definitively established by prior research.
Distinguishing between shared recall and unilateral reporting is crucial for understanding memory contamination dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos

Outlook:

Future research should employ refined methodologies to isolate the impact of detail order on memory accuracy.
Clarifying the mechanisms behind collaborative memory contamination is essential for accurate eyewitness testimony and information recall.