Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical education: the supervisory process.

M A McGovern1, E C Dean

  • 1Department of Speech Therapy, Queen Margaret College, Edinburgh.

The British Journal of Disorders of Communication
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The introduction of a new robot for assistance in ophthalmic surgery.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2013
Same author

Remediation of sentence processing deficits in aphasia using a computer-based microworld.

Brain and language·1996
Same author

Photochemotherapy in human heart transplant recipients at high risk for fatal rejection.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·1992
Same author

The use of video in the self-evaluation of speech therapy students.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1985
Same author

Student perceptions of performance.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1983
Same author

Appraisal of therapeutic performance.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1982
Same journal

Semantic-pragmatic disorder: a right hemisphere syndrome?

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
Same journal

The British Picture Vocabulary Scale: constructing confidence intervals to evaluate change.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
Same journal

Assessing children with language tests--which tests to use?

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
Same journal

Mother-child interactions with language-impaired children and their siblings.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
Same journal

Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
Same journal

Perception of pitch contours in single words in alaryngeal speech.

The British journal of disorders of communication·1991
See all related articles

This study analyzed clinical supervision, identifying clinician interview strategies and comparing perceptions of participation and feedback between supervisors and student therapists. Findings offer insights into effective supervisory practices.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Clinical Supervision
  • Therapist Training

Background:

  • Extends previous research on analyzing clinical competence in student therapists.
  • Focuses on the supervisory process and its impact on trainee development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze supervisory interactions and extend existing categories for assessing clinical competence.
  • To investigate clinicians' use of interview strategies during supervision.
  • To compare supervisors' and students' perceptions of their dyadic interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Video-recording and analysis of supervisory interactions between five students and their clinicians.
  • Utilizing visual analogue scales to rate participants' perceptions of the dyad.
  • Categorizing clinicians' verbal comments and analyzing specific interview strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Clinicians' verbal comments aligned with previously identified categories.
  • Seven distinct interview strategies were identified within the supervisory process.
  • Supervisors were more accurate in estimating student participation, while students better estimated positive feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The study validates existing categories for analyzing clinical competence in supervision.
  • Identifies specific clinician interview strategies employed during supervision.
  • Highlights discrepancies in perception between supervisors and students regarding participation and feedback, suggesting areas for improved training and communication.