Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automaticity of Word Recognition is a Unique Predictor of Reading Fluency in Middle-School Students.

Journal of educational psychology·2026
Same author

Military Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predicts Greater Negative Metacognitive Bias.

The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Subjective cognitive concerns and global metacognitive bias in prodromal Parkinson's and Parkinson's disease without cognitive impairment.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Feasibility of Internet-Based Mind-Body Training for Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Anxiety/stress symptoms uniquely predict greater negative global metacognitive bias in post-9/11 veterans.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Voluntary and involuntary attention affect face discrimination differently.

Michael Esterman1, William Prinzmetal, Joseph DeGutis

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States. esterman@jhu.edu

Neuropsychologia
|January 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Voluntary attention, unlike involuntary attention, enhances activity in the brain's face processing areas (fusiform face area). This suggests different neural mechanisms underlie these attention types, impacting recognition.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Attention plays a crucial role in perception and cognition.
  • Distinguishing between voluntary (endogenous) and involuntary (exogenous) attention is key to understanding its neural basis.
  • The fusiform face area (FFA) is a critical region for face processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether voluntary and involuntary attention have the same perceptual consequences.
  • To compare brain activity in the fusiform face area (FFA) and frontal-parietal attention networks under different attentional cueing conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
  • Participants performed spatial cueing tasks under both voluntary and involuntary attention conditions.
  • Trial and stimulus parameters were kept identical across conditions, with cue predictability differing.

Main Results:

  • Voluntary spatial cueing led to significantly increased activity in the FFA compared to involuntary cueing.
  • Activity in frontal-parietal attention networks was also examined, though FFA showed differential responses.
  • These findings highlight distinct neural processing for voluntary versus involuntary attention.

Conclusions:

  • Voluntary attention enhances neural processing in face-specific brain regions more than involuntary attention.
  • The results support the notion that different types of attention have differential effects on cognitive processes, including face recognition.
  • This study provides insights into the neural mechanisms differentiating endogenous and exogenous attention.