Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization
Robert S Kern1, Keith H Nuechterlein, Michael F Green
1Department of Psychology, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles CA 90073, USA. rkern@ucla.edu
Normative data for the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery were collected from a diverse U.S. sample. These data enable accurate interpretation of cognitive test results in schizophrenia clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative developed a standard cognitive battery for schizophrenia research.
- Interpreting results across independently developed tests with varying norms is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish normative data for the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) in a representative U.S. community sample.
- To facilitate score interpretation and facilitate composite score derivation for clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Administered the MCCB to 300 individuals across five U.S. geographic regions.
- Stratified recruitment by age, gender, and education, employing scientific survey sampling.
- Collected data in a single session, followed by analysis of demographic effects.
Main Results:
- Significant effects of age and education on cognitive performance were identified across MCCB tests.
- Gender effects varied by cognitive measure, indicating a need for demographic corrections.
- The MCCB components were successfully co-normed, incorporating demographic adjustments.
Conclusions:
- Co-norming the MCCB enhances the validity of score interpretation and cross-study communication.
- These normative data are crucial for estimating treatment effects in clinical trials for schizophrenia.
- The derived composite scores will improve the interpretability of findings from interventions targeting cognitive function.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Critical Thinking II
