Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cross-task individual differences in error processing: neural, electrophysiological, and genetic components.

Michael J Frank1, Christopher D'Lauro, Tim Curran

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. mfrank@u.arizona.edu

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|January 15, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HSSM: A Widely Applicable Toolbox for Hierarchical Bayesian Neurocognitive Modeling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Impacted and preserved sub-domains of cognitive control in schizophrenia.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Increased Reporting of Speech in Degraded Stimuli in Schizophrenia: A Case Control Study with Sine-Wave-Speech.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2026
Same author

Efficient Inference in First Passage Time Models.

Statistics and computing·2026
Same author

A novel approach-avoidance task to study decision making under outcome uncertainty.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Model-Based Electroencephalography Phenotyping Uncovers Distinct Neurocomputational Mechanisms Underlying Learning Impairments Across Psychopathologies.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026
Same journal

The role of sleep in strengthening face learning and memory consolidation: A systematic review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

How the brain represents a romantic partner: Dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Individuals learning more from negative feedback show enhanced electrophysiological markers of error processing, like the error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe). This suggests a common mechanism across tasks and a link to frontal dopamine levels via COMT genotype influencing Pe.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Error processing is indexed by electrophysiological markers: error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe).
  • Previous research links larger ERNs to negative learning biases, supporting dopamine (DA) reinforcement-learning hypotheses.
  • Generalizability of these findings to non-reinforcement learning tasks and their dopaminergic basis remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if negative learning biases generalize to a recognition memory task.
  • To explore the dopaminergic genetic basis of ERN and Pe components.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral assessment of reinforcement-learning biases (negative vs. positive learners).
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) recording during a recognition memory task with self-correction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the COMT val/met polymorphism for its association with ERN and Pe.

    • Main Results:

    • Negative learners exhibited larger ERNs in the recognition memory task, indicating a shared error-processing mechanism.
    • Negative learners showed enhanced Pes during self-correction of errors compared to positive learners.
    • The COMT genotype influenced Pe magnitude, with met/met homozygotes displaying enhanced Pes, suggesting a role for frontal monoamines.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced error processing mechanisms, reflected by ERN and Pe, are present in negative learners across different task domains.
    • The Pe component, but not ERN, is modulated by the COMT genotype, implicating frontal dopaminergic activity in error awareness.
    • These findings support the role of frontal monoamines and specific ERP components in error awareness and learning.