Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pay for performance: is it ethical?

Susan J Taub1

  • 1Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Comprehensive Ophthalmology Update
|January 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pay for performance in medicine conflicts with physician altruism and the Hippocratic oath. This model may create power imbalances and lead to ethical abuses in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Internet's role in patient/physician interaction: bringing our understanding in line with online reality.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2006
Same journal

Persistent corneal ulcer.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
Same journal

Gonioscopy.org: a video Atlas.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
Same journal

Review of sulfonamide-induced acute myopia and acute bilateral angle-closure glaucoma.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
Same journal

Intravitreal pharmacotherapy: applications in retinal disease.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
Same journal

Comments on: management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
Same journal

Management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Comprehensive ophthalmology update·2008
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Policy
  • Physician Motivation

Background:

  • The implementation of pay for performance (P4P) in medicine has sparked debate regarding its effectiveness and ethical implications.
  • Traditional physician motivation stems from ideals like altruism and community concern, which are central to the Hippocratic oath.
  • The physician autonomy model, focused on shared decision-making for positive patient outcomes, is gaining traction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the philosophical and psychological impacts of pay for performance on medical practice.
  • To analyze the potential conflicts between P4P and established medical ethics and physician motivators.
  • To explore the risks associated with integrating P4P into healthcare delivery systems.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Philosophical analysis of P4P principles in relation to medical ethics.
  • Psychological examination of physician motivation and autonomy.
  • Review of research from the corporate sector on productivity-driven models.

    • Main Results:

    • Pay for performance fundamentally opposes the altruistic principles inherent in the Hippocratic oath.
    • P4P may undermine the physician autonomy model, potentially creating a detrimental power imbalance between patients and clinicians.
    • Adoption of P4P may foster a hyper-productive culture, increasing risks of addictive behaviors and ethical misconduct in healthcare.

    Conclusions:

    • The core tenets of pay for performance are philosophically incompatible with the traditional ethical framework of medicine.
    • Implementing P4P could erode physician altruism and patient-physician relationships, leading to negative consequences.
    • Healthcare systems must carefully consider the psychological and ethical ramifications before widespread adoption of P4P.