Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Use of In vivo Imaging to Monitor the Progression of Experimental Mouse Cytomegalovirus Infection in Neonates
Published on: July 6, 2013
Indirect effects of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients
María José Pérez-Sola1, Juan José Castón, Rafael Solana
1Clinic Unit of Infectious Diseases, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Abstract:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important and frequent complication in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. This infection causes direct effects by viral inclusion in the cells of various tissues, as well as indirect effects by interaction between low levels of viremia and the host immune response. These indirect effects, such as increased incidence of graft rejection and opportunistic infections or decreased recipient survival, can be as severe as the direct effects, and thus require implementation of preventative practice guidelines. Universal prophylaxis against CMV has shown to be effective for preventing CMV disease and asymptomatic CMV replication, and can be considered the treatment of choice for preventing the indirect effects of this infection.
Insights
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses risks for solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Universal prophylaxis effectively prevents CMV disease and its severe indirect effects, such as graft rejection.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Virology
- Transplant Medicine
Background:
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common and significant complication in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
- CMV infection can cause direct cellular damage and indirect immune-mediated effects, including graft rejection and increased susceptibility to other infections.
- These indirect effects can severely impact patient survival and graft outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
- To highlight the direct and indirect effects of CMV infection.
- To emphasize the importance of preventative strategies against CMV in SOT patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
- Analysis of the direct and indirect mechanisms of CMV pathogenesis.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of preventative practice guidelines.
Main Results:
- CMV infection leads to direct viral damage and indirect immune responses.
- Indirect effects include increased graft rejection, opportunistic infections, and reduced recipient survival.
- Universal prophylaxis has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing CMV disease and asymptomatic replication.
Conclusions:
- Universal prophylaxis is a crucial strategy for managing Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
- Preventing CMV disease and its indirect effects is essential for improving patient and graft outcomes.
- Prophylactic measures should be considered the standard of care for CMV prevention in SOT.
More Related Videos
11:18Expanding Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes from Umbilical Cord Blood that Target Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Adenovirus
Published on: May 7, 2012
08:52Generation of Multivirus-specific T Cells to Prevent/treat Viral Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Published on: May 27, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Cytomegalovirus Disease
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency disorders...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...