Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.

Rick P Thomas1, Michael R Dougherty, Amber M Sprenger

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019, USA. rthomas@psychology.ou.edu

Psychological Review
|January 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Rethinking the Role of Teams and Training in Geopolitical Forecasting: The Effect of Uncontrolled Method Variance on Statistical Conclusions.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

A memory-theoretic account of citation propagation.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Strength of Belief Guides Information Foraging.

Psychological science·2022
Same author

Nudging Discharge Readiness With a Poster: A Sequential, Exploratory Mixed Methods Pilot Study of Patient Caregivers.

Journal of patient experience·2021
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a general model for hypothesis generation in human reasoning, explaining how generating hypotheses from memory impacts judgment and decision-making processes. The model illustrates how errors in hypothesis generation can lead to biases in overall judgment.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Human Reasoning

Background:

  • Hypothesis generation is a fundamental cognitive process across various domains, including clinical diagnosis, auditing, and everyday information interpretation.
  • Understanding how individuals generate hypotheses from memory is crucial for explaining probability judgments and hypothesis testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a general model of human judgment that describes the process of hypothesis generation from memory.
  • To explain how generated hypotheses form the basis for probability judgment and hypothesis testing.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed three simulation studies to illustrate the properties and applications of the proposed general model.
  • Simulations were used to demonstrate the model's capacity to explain established findings in judgment and decision-making research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The model effectively illustrates how hypotheses are generated from memory and subsequently influence probability judgments.
  • Simulation results demonstrated the model's utility in explaining common phenomena in judgment and decision making.

Conclusions:

  • Errors and biases in the hypothesis generation phase can systematically cascade into errors and biases in subsequent judgment and decision-making.
  • The proposed model offers a unified framework for understanding hypothesis generation and its impact on cognitive biases.