Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Centralization and research governance: does it work?

Michelle Howarth1, Rosie Kneafsey, Carol Haigh

  • 1School of Nursing, University of Salford, Manchester, UK. m.l.howarth2@salford.ac.uk

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|February 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting: A qualitative study highlighting the need for individualised, person-centred care.

PloS one·2026
Same author

How to develop nursing student practice placement opportunities in care homes.

Nursing older people·2026
Same author

Climate change and sustainable healthcare practices in nursing: A multi-country exploratory online survey.

The journal of climate change and health·2026
Same author

Nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and perspectives in relation to climate change and sustainable healthcare practices: A systematic review.

The journal of climate change and health·2026
Same author

Enhancing diversity and inclusion in paramedic education: Exploring educator and learner perspectives on asset-based initiatives.

Health services management research·2025
Same author

Strategies for Implementing Research Inspired Teaching in Higher Education for Midwifery and Nursing: A Qualitative Study Introducing the 4M Model.

Global qualitative nursing research·2025
Same journal

Clinical Supervision and Burnout Among Nurses: A Scoping Review.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Effectiveness of Practice Development Interventions on Patient and Staff Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

A Study of the Correlation Between Vulnerability to Psychological Crisis and Self-Disclosure in Elderly Patients With Multimorbidity: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Elderspeak in Healthcare Settings: How Care, Control and Personhood Intersect in Care Communication-A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

A Model for Sustaining Second Victim Peer Support Programs in Healthcare: A Delphi Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The Practice Experience of ICU Nurses in Preventing Pressure Injuries: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
See all related articles

The UK centralized Research Management and Governance model streamlined resources but faced mixed reception from researchers. While managers saw benefits, researchers perceived some processes as hindrances, indicating a need for transparent, resourced partnerships.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Nursing Management
  • Research Governance

Background:

  • A centralized Research Management and Governance Model was implemented in the UK in 2004 across 14 primary care organizations.
  • The model aimed to foster a quality research culture by streamlining bureaucratic processes.
  • This initiative responded to international concerns regarding research conduct and the need for effective monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact and success of the United Kingdom's centralized Research Management and Governance model.
  • To understand researchers' and managers' experiences with the implemented model.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire survey distributed to 76 researchers across 14 organizations in 2004.
  • Semi-structured interviews conducted with five research and development managers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes and perceptions.

    • Main Results:

    • 36.8% of researchers found governance processes useful or very useful, while 47.3% viewed them as a hindrance.
    • Managers reported that the model supported the research infrastructure and reduced paperwork.
    • Managers perceived benefits of centralization but also noted a reduction in their autonomy and control.

    Conclusions:

    • Centralizing research governance can effectively maximize research resources, though researcher buy-in remains a challenge.
    • Partnership working is key to streamlining research governance but requires adequate resourcing and transparency.
    • The UK model offers potential benefits for international research management and governance strategies.