Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Doing versus knowing.

Peter R Killeen1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104 killeen@asu.edu www.asu.edu/clas/psych/dresearch/blab.html.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twiddling Bits.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same author

Agency.

The Journal of general psychology·2024
Same author

Hyperbolae.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024
Same author

From data through discount rates to the area under the curve.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2023
Same author

Theory of reinforcement schedules.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2023
Same author

Discounting and the portfolio of desires.

Psychological review·2023
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Robots serve as simplified models for understanding complex scientific questions, aiding in the development of knowledge through constructivist approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Robotics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Aristotle's Four Causes provide a framework for scientific inquiry.
  • Understanding complex systems requires specifying trigger, function, mechanism, and representation.
  • Robots offer tangible models for studying system functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the utility of robots as models in scientific knowledge construction.
  • To apply Aristotle's Four Causes to the design and understanding of robotic systems.
  • To investigate how physical and biological constraints influence robotic mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing robots as simplified systems for scientific investigation.
  • Analyzing robotic functions within physical, biological, and epigenetic constraints.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing formal representation techniques on robotic models.

    • Main Results:

    • Robots effectively model specific functions relevant to scientific questions.
    • Constraints on robotic mechanisms highlight the hypothesis space for candidate mechanisms.
    • Robots are more amenable to formal representation than complex target systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Robots are valuable tools for constructivist scientific knowledge development.
    • The application of Aristotle's framework enhances comprehension of complex systems via robotic models.
    • Robotic modeling facilitates a deeper understanding of mechanisms and representations in science.