Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is language processing different in dialogue?

Dale J Barr1, Boaz Keysar

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 dale.barr@ucr.edu.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Italians Understand Spanish? Language Closeness Exacerbates the Illusion of Understanding.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Zero-sum beliefs across age and generations.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Embarrassment guides language choice.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Perspective conflict disrupts pragmatic inference in real-time language comprehension.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Better power by design: Permuted-subblock randomization boosts power in repeated-measures experiments.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

The influence of accent on the evaluation of trust-building efforts during conflict.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Language processing mechanisms used in dialogue are also present in monologue, contrary to Pickering & Garrod

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Pickering & Garrod (2023) proposed that automatic language processing mechanisms are unique to dialogue.
  • This assertion implies a fundamental difference in cognitive processes between interactive and non-interactive language use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the claim that automatic language processing mechanisms are absent in monologue.
  • To propose that dialogue merely offers a distinct context for the operation of universal language processing mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Re-evaluation of existing theories on language production and comprehension.
  • Analysis of cognitive processes involved in both dialogue and monologue.
  • Comparative linguistic and psycholinguistic framework application.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests that the core automatic mechanisms for language processing are not exclusive to dialogue.
  • Monologue involves the same fundamental cognitive processes as dialogue, albeit in a different interactive context.
  • The distinction between dialogue and monologue processing may be contextual rather than mechanistic.

Conclusions:

  • The automatic mechanisms underlying language processing are operative in both dialogue and monologue.
  • Dialogue and monologue represent different contexts for the application of shared language processing mechanisms.
  • The findings necessitate a revision of theories positing distinct mechanisms for dialogue and monologue.