Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Differences in echocardiographic indices between patients with partial and advanced interatrial conduction delay
Vignendra Ariyarajah1, Jaxon Fernandes, Sirin Apiyasawat
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St Boniface General Hospital/University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. vignendra@hotmail.com
Partial interatrial block (IAB) (P wave > or =110 ms) is a marker of left atrial abnormality. A similar association among patients with advanced IAB (biphasic P waves > or =110 ms in leads II, III, and aVF) is unknown. The authors screened 27 consecutive patients for advanced IAB with transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs). Of those, 19 who had repeat TTEs after 2 years formed our study cohort. The authors used 44 consecutive controls with partial IAB who had been similarly screened and had follow-up TTEs 2 years apart. TTE parameters were comparable at baseline between groups but were expectedly different on follow-up. When change (delta value) in these indices was compared, however, only left atrial dimension remained significant (advanced 0.07+/-0.06 mm vs partial IAB 0.03+/-0.06 mm; P=.03). Further study over a longer duration is warranted to ascertain if advanced IAB patients would benefit from follow-up noninvasive cardiac imaging for appropriate risk stratification.
Partial interatrial block (IAB) (P wave > or =110 ms) is a marker of left atrial abnormality. A similar association among patients with advanced IAB (biphasic P waves > or =110 ms in leads II, III, and aVF) is unknown. The authors screened 27 consecutive patients for advanced IAB with transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs). Of those, 19 who had repeat TTEs after 2 years formed our study cohort. The authors used 44 consecutive controls with partial IAB who had been similarly screened and had follow-up TTEs 2 years apart. TTE parameters were comparable at baseline between groups but were expectedly different on follow-up. When change (delta value) in these indices was compared, however, only left atrial dimension remained significant (advanced 0.07+/-0.06 mm vs partial IAB 0.03+/-0.06 mm; P=.03). Further study over a longer duration is warranted to ascertain if advanced IAB patients would benefit from follow-up noninvasive cardiac imaging for appropriate risk stratification.
More Related Videos
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
08:57Pulsed Wave Doppler Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction in the ZSF-1 Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease
Published on: May 22, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests