Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Positron Emission Tomography01:29

Positron Emission Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Identification of Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtypes on Computed Tomography of the Head.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Large language models as cost-conscious decision aids in emergency medicine: protocol support for imaging in lower back pain.

Emergency radiology·2025
Same author

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for opportunistic Agatston scoring on non-gated chest computed tomography.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Regulating Generative AI in Radiology Practice: A Trilaminar Approach to Balancing Risk with Innovation.

Academic radiology·2025
Same author

Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on Electrocardiogram Using Artificial Intelligence.

Circulation. Heart failure·2025
Same author

PRECISE framework: Enhanced radiology reporting with GPT for improved readability, reliability, and patient-centered care.

European journal of radiology·2025
Same journal

Comment on "Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Financial Toxicity in Outpatient Imaging Patients".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Comparison of supplemental breast cancer screening outcomes for automated versus hand-held ultrasound.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Screening Mammography Completion Among Women Enrolled in a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus Infection Beyond the Lung: A Multi-Organ Radiological Perspective on Diagnosis, Imaging Modalities, and Precautionary Measures for Radiology Departments.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports.

Pragya A Dang1, Mannudeep K Kalra, Michael A Blake

  • 1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|March 4, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Natural language processing (NLP) and online analytic processing (OLAP) revealed varied recommendation patterns in radiology reports. These patterns differed significantly by patient age, imaging modality, and patient status, highlighting key trends in diagnostic imaging.

More Related Videos

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Radiology Data Analysis
  • Clinical Data Mining

Background:

  • Unstructured radiology reports contain valuable data for clinical decision-making.
  • Assessing patterns in radiology recommendations is crucial for optimizing patient care.
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Online Analytic Processing (OLAP) offer advanced tools for analyzing large datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the application of NLP and OLAP in analyzing unstructured radiology reports.
  • To identify patterns in imaging recommendations based on patient and imaging characteristics.
  • To assess how factors like age, gender, modality, and patient status influence recommendation rates.

Main Methods:

  • A large database of 4,279,179 radiology reports from 1995-2004 was compiled.
  • NLP and OLAP tools were used to classify reports with and without recommendations (I(REC) vs. N(REC)).
  • I(REC) rates were analyzed across various demographics, imaging modalities, indications, diseases, subspecialties, and referring physicians, including temporal trends.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in I(REC) rates were found across age groups, ranging from 4.8% to 9.5%.
  • Computed tomography showed the highest recommendation rates (17.3%) among imaging modalities.
  • I(REC) rates varied significantly by subspecialty and were generally higher for outpatients compared to inpatients.

Conclusions:

  • The analysis of radiology reports using NLP and OLAP demonstrated substantial variations in recommendation trends.
  • These trends differed based on imaging modalities and key patient/imaging characteristics.
  • The findings underscore the importance of data-driven insights for understanding and refining diagnostic imaging practices.