Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Categorization in the wild.

Robert J Glushko1, Paul P Maglio, Teenie Matlock

  • 1School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|March 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From hope and action to giving up: Students' stories of coping with climate change.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Developing and evaluating a situated psychometric instrument for assessing climate anxiety: The SAM<sup>2</sup> CAM.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Developing and Evaluating the Comprehensive Hierarchical Eustress Review (CHER).

Journal of happiness studies·2026
Same author

The Psychology of Framing: How Everyday Language Shapes the Way We Think, Feel, and Act.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2024
Same author

Establishing a Comprehensive Hierarchical construct of Eustress (CHE).

Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)·2024
Same author

Habitualness, reward and external constraints: Exploring the underlying influences of daily water intake using the Situated Assessment Method<sup>2</sup>.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2024
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Cognitive science traditionally studies cultural categorization but must now examine individual and institutional systems. Technological advances highlight the adaptive nature of categorization mechanisms, influencing social and cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Science
  • Information Science

Background:

  • Cognitive science research on categorization has predominantly focused on cultural systems.
  • Individual and institutional categorization systems are increasingly powerful and accessible due to technological advancements.
  • Existing research has overlooked the cognitive and social mechanisms underlying these systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To broaden the understanding of categorization beyond cultural contexts.
  • To explore the cognitive and social mechanisms driving individual and institutional classification systems.
  • To investigate the impact of technology on categorization and its adaptive nature.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of cultural, individual, and institutional categorization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of social factors influencing classification stability.
  • Assessment of interoperability facilitated by shared conceptual systems.
  • Analysis of recent technological impacts on classification systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Diverse categorization types reveal previously underappreciated aspects, such as social stability factors.
    • Interoperability, enabled by shared conceptual systems, is crucial for agent interaction.
    • Technological developments significantly influence and reshape classification systems.
    • Basic categorization mechanisms demonstrate high adaptability to changing environments.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive understanding of categorization requires integrating cultural, individual, and institutional perspectives.
    • Social and technological factors are critical drivers of categorization system evolution.
    • Categorization mechanisms are fundamentally adaptive, responding to environmental and technological shifts.