Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
The missing data problem in birth weight percentiles and thresholds for "small-for-gestational-age"
Jennifer A Hutcheon1, Robert W Platt
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. jennifer.hutcheon@mail.mcgill.ca
Insights
Conventional weight-for-gestational-age charts for identifying small-for-gestational-age infants are biased due to missing fetal weight data. New methods are needed for unbiased assessment of fetal growth and restriction risks.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Fetal growth research
Background:
- Weight-for-gestational-age charts traditionally define small-for-gestational-age infants using livebirth data.
- These charts have significant limitations for preterm infants due to missing in-utero fetal weight data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the bias in current small-for-gestational-age definitions.
- To propose methods for unbiased perinatal weight percentile calculation.
Main Methods:
- Critically evaluate existing weight-for-gestational-age chart methodologies.
- Discuss the impact of missing fetal weight data on etiologic studies.
- Recommend standard epidemiologic approaches for handling missing data.
Main Results:
- Livebirth-based references introduce considerable bias in etiologic studies of fetal growth restriction.
- Missing data on in-utero fetal weights are a major limitation, especially for preterm infants.
Conclusions:
- Standard epidemiologic methods for missing data are crucial.
- Unbiased perinatal weight percentiles are necessary for accurate fetal growth assessment.
- Improved methods will enhance understanding of fetal growth restriction risks.
Abstract:
Weight-for-gestational-age charts and definitions of "small-for-gestational-age" based on the distribution of livebirths at a given gestational age have conventionally been used to identify infants whose fetal growth is poor. However, references based on the weights of only livebirths have serious shortcomings at preterm ages due to missing data on the weights of fetuses still in utero, and these missing data introduce considerable bias to etiologic studies of fetal growth restriction. Application of standard epidemiologic approaches for missing data is needed to help produce perinatal weight percentiles that provide unbiased assessment of fetal growth and risks of small-for-gestational-age.
Related Concept Videos
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Regression Toward the Mean
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility, suggesting a...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Normal Distribution
