Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham1

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. shinn@cns.bu.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|April 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Task-Irrelevant Talker Identity and Continuity on Spatial Selective Attention Under Interruption.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Prediction from Statistical Learning Aids Auditory Scene Analysis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Acoustic Salience Drives Pupillary Dynamics in an Interrupted, Reverberant Task.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Investigating bottlenose dolphin physiology using near-infrared spectroscopy.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Distinct talkers combat catastrophic failures of spatial attention due to interruption.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cat-astrophic update: What makes an interrupter more disruptive?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Attention mechanisms in vision and hearing share common principles. Failures in auditory object formation or selection explain informational masking, suggesting unified neural control across sensory modalities.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Visual attention theories propose attention operates on perceptual objects, influencing perception of competing stimuli.
  • Auditory attention theories are less developed, lacking a comprehensive framework for attentional influence on perception.
  • Informational masking in auditory perception presents phenomena not fully explained by existing auditory attention models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a unified framework for auditory attention based on principles of visual attention.
  • To explain auditory phenomena, specifically informational masking, using object-based attention mechanisms.
  • To investigate the potential for shared neural mechanisms underlying attention across sensory modalities.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical analysis comparing principles of visual object formation and selective attention with auditory perception.
  • Re-evaluation of existing research on informational masking through the lens of object-based attention.
  • Comparative analysis of neural mechanisms potentially involved in cross-modal attention.

Main Results:

  • Visual attention principles, particularly object formation and selection, can explain auditory phenomena like informational masking.
  • Failures in auditory object formation or selection are identified as key contributors to informational masking.
  • The findings suggest that auditory and visual attention may rely on similar underlying neural control mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • A unified framework for attention across sensory modalities is proposed, integrating auditory and visual attention research.
  • Object-based attention provides a viable explanation for complex auditory masking effects.
  • Shared neural mechanisms likely support attentional control and perceptual processing in both auditory and visual systems.